[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”)
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”) |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jun 2020 13:01:11 +0200 |
It looks like this was discussed here:
https://github.com/CTeX-org/forum/issues/29
(it's in Chinese, but google translate does a good job on the text.)
According to the report, it's a bug in xdvipdfmx, and the blank pdf
file is within spec.
I looked at epdf.c, but there was no change in the last 2 years.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:18 AM Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> > xdvipdfmx:fatal: typecheck: Invalid object type: -1 7 (line 2161)
> >
> > This is on a Fedora system with xdvipdfmx 20190225 and gs 9.52.
>
> It seems that you probably have to update your TeX system...
>
> https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/490616/xdvipdfmx-typecheck-problem
>
> If this is not a feasible solution please contact the TeX maintainers
> of your distribution.
>
> An alternative is to directly use TeXLive together with its binaries,
> which use static linking as much as possible.
>
>
> Werner
>
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwenn@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jean Abou Samra, 2020/06/17
Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Valentin Villenave, 2020/06/17
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Werner LEMBERG, 2020/06/17
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/18
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Carl Sorensen, 2020/06/18
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/18
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), David Kastrup, 2020/06/19