[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”)
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”) |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jun 2020 05:56:52 +0200 (CEST) |
> Git bisect actually tells me that xdvipdfmx started misbehaving from
> the same commit that caused gs issues:
>
> 017927b4d63c317e1fc450be2537ccc058072538 (HEAD)
> Author: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwenn@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri Jun 5 20:36:42 2020 +0200
> Unify calling convention for command-line and API GS use
>
> Jonas reverted some parts of that with MR !148, but that particular
> issue was left unaddressed. That affects xdvipdfmx svn/20190225,
> which is shipped with Fedora 32, and with a more recent build from
> the 2020 texlive release (20200315). (Now, I haven’t been able to
> reproduce it on LilyDev so other libraries may be a factor as well.)
>
> It already took me many hours to find the eight regtests that
> trigger this, but there are also many snippets and NR ly blocks,
> which I won’t be able to track down :-/
Could you send me off-list an example, this is, all necessary input
files that allow me to directly call xetex (and thus xdvipdfmx),
before and after the problematic commit? I can then start to reduce
the example and contact the xdvipdfmx author, asking for further
analysis. Or maybe you have produced such a minimum example already?
Werner
Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jean Abou Samra, 2020/06/17
Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Valentin Villenave, 2020/06/17
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”),
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/18
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Carl Sorensen, 2020/06/18
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/18
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), David Kastrup, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/06/19