Re: github mirror of lilypond?

[David Kastrup]

Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:

>>    Send an email (must be less than 64 KB) to
>> <address@hidden> briefly explaining your work, with the
>> patch files attached.  Translators should send patches to
>> <address@hidden>.  After your patches are reviewed, the
>> developers may push one or more of them to the main repository or
>> discuss them with you.
>
> Han-Wen has recently pushed a bunch of changes directly to Rietveld,
> most of them quite uncontroversial.  I assume that this is as good as
> an e-mail :-)
>
> I thus suggest that after his patches have been reviewed,

How are they going to get reviewed when there is nothing pointing to
them?  How would anyone including Han-Wen know when the review phase
ends?

> he should simply commit to `staging`.  If a developer has doubts, we
> can create an SourceForge issue to do it the normal way.
>
> Of course, this is a temporary measure until Janek finds and
>implements something better (see the Salzburg googledoc file posted
>recently for more).

-- 
David Kastrup