[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics
From: |
Peter Toye |
Subject: |
Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Jan 2020 15:32:14 +0000 |
Apologies.
-------------------------
Saturday, January 4, 2020, 3:23:30 PM, Dan Eble wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2020, at 06:09, Peter Toye
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Thanks for that. As everyone seems to be on all the mailing lists. I sort of
>> assumed that cross-links wouldn't be necessary.
> I am subscribed to lilypond-devel only.
> —
> Dan
Apologies
Peter
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, (continued)
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wol, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/06
- How to use LilyDev without systemd, Peter Toye, 2020/01/09
- Re: How to use LilyDev without systemd, Federico Bruni, 2020/01/09
- Re: How to use LilyDev without systemd, Peter Toye, 2020/01/09
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Dan Eble, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics,
Peter Toye <=
Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Malte Meyn, 2020/01/04
Re: move some OLL functions to vanilla LilyPond? [was: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics], Urs Liska, 2020/01/06