lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How should tupletSpannerDuration actually work?


From: Benkő Pál
Subject: Re: How should tupletSpannerDuration actually work?
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:41:39 +0100

2013/1/12 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden>
> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 10:25 AM
> Subject: How should tupletSpannerDuration actually work?
>
>
>
>>
>> I have a hard time considering the output of
>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>> \version "2.16.0"
>>
>> \relative c' {
>>  \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 2)
>>  \times 2/3 { c8 d e f g a g f e d c d }
>>  \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
>>  \times 2/3 { c4 d e f g a g f e d c d }
>> }
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>>
>> useful:

the tuplet bracket over the crotchets is what the client asked for,
so while I too consider it useless, there may be not too much
to do about it.

the first example is more serious, it shows a shortcoming of
default beaming: it can't distinguish between sextuplet and
(subdivided) triplet (contrary to the NOTE in the header of
time-signature-settings.scm).

p



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]