[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How should tupletSpannerDuration actually work?
From: |
Benkő Pál |
Subject: |
Re: How should tupletSpannerDuration actually work? |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:41:39 +0100 |
2013/1/12 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden>
> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 10:25 AM
> Subject: How should tupletSpannerDuration actually work?
>
>
>
>>
>> I have a hard time considering the output of
>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>> \version "2.16.0"
>>
>> \relative c' {
>> \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 2)
>> \times 2/3 { c8 d e f g a g f e d c d }
>> \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
>> \times 2/3 { c4 d e f g a g f e d c d }
>> }
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>>
>> useful:
the tuplet bracket over the crotchets is what the client asked for,
so while I too consider it useless, there may be not too much
to do about it.
the first example is more serious, it shows a shortcoming of
default beaming: it can't distinguish between sextuplet and
(subdivided) triplet (contrary to the NOTE in the header of
time-signature-settings.scm).
p
Re: How should tupletSpannerDuration actually work?, Keith OHara, 2013/01/12