[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code review/discussion time again.
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Code review/discussion time again. |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:24:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:55:20AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Well, given my apparent discrepance between coding and social
>> interaction skills, the resulting dearth of actually useful advice and
>> other things (recently a patch of mine was rejected that actually would
>> have brought some oversights in line with the rest), I think that it
>> might be the smoothest course of action if I just had commit access
>> myself.
>
> The rejected patch is unfortunate, but in the near future I think
> we'll continue to see good things sometimes being rejected. Most
> developers (including Carl) only know bits and pieces of the
> architecture, so a lot of patches won't be understood.
That's not a good situation. Developers come and go. So it would seem
like a good idea to make the architecture more transparent. Part of
that is documentation, part of it is simplification.
--
David Kastrup
- Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/19
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/23
Re: Code review/discussion time again., Graham Percival, 2009/11/21
Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21