[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code review/discussion time again.
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Code review/discussion time again. |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:30:52 -0700 |
On 11/21/09 12:55 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I have no idea what I am doing here. In particular not with the
>> \override, and the set-object-property!. Can somebody explain to me
>> just what data structures I happen to manipulate, and how a user is
>> actually _supposed_ to be mangling them?
Some patience may be required. 2 days (during the week, not including
weekend time) is not very long for waiting for feedback on an entirely new
subject, with a quite general question.
>
> Well, given my apparent discrepance between coding and social
> interaction skills, the resulting dearth of actually useful advice and
> other things (recently a patch of mine was rejected that actually would
> have brought some oversights in line with the rest),
I don't think your patch was rejected. It was just not immediately applied.
Sometimes it takes a while to get patches approved through the system.
I would like to suggest that you post patches on Rietveld, rather than
directly to the -devel list. That's the current recommended procedure (see
the Contributors' Guide for more information). You'll get comments from
more than just me, and that will facilitate things.
HTH,
Carl
- Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/19
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again.,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/23
Re: Code review/discussion time again., Graham Percival, 2009/11/21