[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:33:39 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 05:13:12PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> On 6/23/09 4:07 PM, "Neil Puttock" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Since the Dynamic_engraver is no longer used due to being replaced
> > just over a year ago, I'd like to remove it completely.
>
> Shouldn't we do this by eliminating Dynamic_engraver and renaming
> New_dynamic_engraver to Dynamic_engraver?
IMO yes, but perhaps make it gradual:
- remove Dynamics_engraver for 2.13.3 (assuming we fix the
uploading problems with .2)
- look at what breaks.
- rename New_Dynamics_engraver to Dynamics_engraver, write
convert-ly rule, and include in 2.13.4.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/23
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Patrick McCarty, 2009/06/24
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/29
- type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/29