[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:33:45 +0100 |
2009/6/24 Carl D. Sorensen <address@hidden>:
> Shouldn't we do this by eliminating Dynamic_engraver and renaming
> New_dynamic_engraver to Dynamic_engraver?
I'm not sure, since New_dynamic_engraver doesn't have all the
functionality of Dynamic_engraver (though it would be easy enough to
have a convert rule which adds Dynamic_align_engraver if necessary.)
Regards,
Neil
- Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/23
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Patrick McCarty, 2009/06/24
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/29
- type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/29
- Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/29