Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja

[Tuomas Lukka]

> >>>Having some connections of a cell (or its clone) such that they are 
> >>>visible
> >>>or not visible, depending on whether something else happened to be in 
> >>>some way
> >>>or some other way is VERY counterintuitive and makes it really easy to 
> >>>get
> >>>lost in the structure.
> >>>
> >>>     
> >>>
> >>Sorry, I don't understand at all. :-(
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >If you don't have the clone dimension visible, then *sometimes* an 
> >operation will
> >make visible connections to the cell you're at and sometimes nothing 
> >happens.
> >
> 
> *If* you are viewing d.contain and d..contain-list. I think if you 
> expect a user to understand d.contain and d..contain-list, you can 
> expect them to understand about d.clone as well. Especially since if 
> you're viewing d.contain and d..contain-list, you *see* the difference 
> (that this cell already has connections on these dimensions)!

The keys work even if you don't view those dims, right?

        Tuomas