[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Emacs next variants

From: Andrew Tropin
Subject: Re: Emacs next variants
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 22:44:01 +0400

On 2023-03-10 19:24, Cayetano Santos wrote:

>>ven. 10 mars 2023 at 19:14, Simon Tournier <> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 17:59, John Kehayias
>> <> wrote:
>>> During this discussion some changes were made to this inheritance structure 
>>> in
>>> <>
>>> and
>>> <>
>> Thanks for pointing that.  From my understanding, it does not change
>> what Cayetanos is raising: emacs-next-tree-sitter is built using
>> '--with-pgtk'.  In fact, the package emacs-next-tree-sitter is built
>> using the master branch (Emacs 30 unbranched yet) with tree-sitter
>> *and* pgtk support.
>> Cheers,
>> simon
> As for the NEWS-29 file:
> "Running this configuration on X is known to have problems, such as
> undesirable frame positioning and various issues with keyboard input of
> sequences such as 'C-;' and 'C-S-u'."
> C.

I haven't used X for a while, but if it's still the case for 30 version,
I guess we can inherit pgtk from tree-sitter.

This will update emacs-next-pgtk from emacs-29 to somewhere near 30 on
master, but I it should be fine. I use the same commit as
emacs-next-tree-sitter in my local tree-sitter+pgtk emacs package and
everything seems to work for me.


Best regards,
Andrew Tropin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]