[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Emacs next variants
From: |
Cayetano Santos |
Subject: |
Emacs next variants |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Mar 2023 19:51:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.8.13; emacs 30.0.50 |
Hi guix,
As for today, the inheritance of emacs, master branch, variants is as
follows
(emacs-next-tree-sitter (emacs-next-gtk (emacs-next (emacs))))
Having tree-sitter is really useful, but optional, and doesn’t produce
any harm to users. They may opt to use it, or not.
This is not the case of the gtk variant. If one wants to use
tree-sitter, the gtk variant is mandatory. When under x server, this
produces a welcome warning advising about unattended effects, crashes,
and leak of support when combining gtk emacs with x server.
So, is there any reason for this dependency chain ? Why not ?
(emacs-next-gtk (emacs-next-tree-sitter (emacs-next (emacs))))
Best,
Cayetano
- Emacs next variants,
Cayetano Santos <=
- Re: Emacs next variants, Simon Tournier, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Cayetano Santos, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Simon Tournier, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, John Kehayias, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Simon Tournier, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Cayetano Santos, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/12
- Re: Emacs next variants, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/03/12