[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Transparent decompression with file system filter
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: Transparent decompression with file system filter |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Jan 2008 11:39:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.4 |
On Saturday 05 January 2008 07:30, Bean wrote:
> I'm thinking that compressed might not be the right word, as filter
> doesn't limit to decompression, it can support decryption or format
> conversion as well. I guess the name grub_file_open_ex may be better.
> I also add a flag to the function, if flag!=0, filters are used, and
> if flag=0, grub_file_open_ex is just like grub_file_open.
I feel that this is too theoretical. In reality, if you want to support, say,
an encrypted file to be decrypted automatically, you need to supply a private
key or a passphrase or something like that. How can this be unified and
transparent?
Okuji
- Re: Transparent decompression with file system filter, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/02
- Re: Transparent decompression with file system filter, Bean, 2008/01/03
- Re: Transparent decompression with file system filter, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/01/03
- Re: Transparent decompression with file system filter, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/04
- Re: Transparent decompression with file system filter, Bean, 2008/01/05
- Re: Transparent decompression with file system filter,
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=
- Re: Transparent decompression with file system filter, Bean, 2008/01/05
- Re: Transparent decompression with file system filter, Bean, 2008/01/13
- Re: Transparent decompression with file system filter, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/13
- Re: Transparent decompression with file system filter, Bean, 2008/01/13
- Re: Transparent decompression with file system filter, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/13