Re: [Gomp-discuss] Primal Subset

[Lars Segerlund]

 I have a question, is not

#pragma omp parallel section

'primitive' in regard to

#pragma omp parallel for

 ?

  Since if we did sections we didn't have to handle the loop variable, 
and a

#pragma omp parallel for

 can be thought of as composed of sections with different loop indexes ?

 / Lars Segerlund.

Scott Robert Ladd wrote:
> Lars wrote:
>
> >   3. Figure out a 'minimal' or 'primitive' subset of omp
>
>
> Here would be my core set to get us started:
> For parallel loops:
>         #pragma omp parallel for
>
> For parallel regions:
>         #pragma omp parallel
>
> That's all I think we need to start with. For the nonce, we can ignore all
> the refinements and library functions, I think; to get started, lets just
> try to parallelize code based on the core pragmas and default variable
> scoping.
>
> Some of the library routines might be useful, but I don't see them as
> essential.
>
> ..Scott
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gomp-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss