Re: [Gomp-discuss] The tree nodes ...

[Lars Segerlund]

 Let's go for that, this is a sensible statement.

 As for gcc's performance, perhaps there is work to do which the people 
interested HPC can target, which they are inclined to do if gcc supports 
HPC. ( can I be the president now ? )

 / Lars.

Scott Robert Ladd wrote:
> > Also, let's not get caught up in a debate about the OpenMP
> > standard and whether or not it will be accepted in mainline GCC.
> > Let's just implement something that has value, once we have
> > something concrete to show we can cross the next bridge.  No
> > point having vacuous flamewars.
>
>
> Good points. My suggestions:
>
> 1) We try to identify and avoid roads that will guarantee rejection by "the
> gcc community."
>
> 2) The we keep the general gcc community appriased of our work. Springing a
> complete implementation at some future date will only defer debate, not
> eliminate it.
>
> I'd like to be certain we're doing the "right" things up front.
>
> ..Scott
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gomp-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss