gnucobol-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [open-cobol-list] Daydreaming about another language to emit


From: David L Lambert
Subject: Re: [open-cobol-list] Daydreaming about another language to emit
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 07:36:35 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20121216 Icedove/3.0.11

Don't be so sure about that... "goto" is a reserved keyword in Java (causes a compilation error if you try to use it as an identifier, but has no other purpose in the current language grammar).

Seriously, I think there would be interest in an open-source COBOL implementation that generated at least one of the following:

* Java code or bytecode, using JDBC (with system properties to configure) as the persistent record store
* .NET (C# or VB or raw CIL)
* JavaScript (like GWT), perhaps use HTML5 local storage as one persistent record store, AJAX calls according to some simple pattern as another


On 10/05/2013 11:46 AM, Sergey Kashyrin wrote:
:-)

Java will never make COBOL people happy :-)
It does not have GO TO statement !

Cheers,
SK

On 10/5/2013 11:14 AM, Brian Tiffin wrote:
I'll just pipe up a little.

Patrick; because of Sergey's C++ emit implementation, it'll be pretty
easy now to figure out how to emit other code.  Java might make some
people happy.

I'm actually amazed how readable GNU Cobol machine generated C is.
Beats Vala and Algol68g (two other C emit systems) hands down.

Charles;   LLVM.  We do clang.  Build compiler with clang, generated
code compiled with clang.  All worked first try.  One small compiler
switch change meant ALL the make check passes as well.
http://opencobol.add1tocobol.com/#does-opencobol-work-with-llvm

When we implement --with-guile as a ./configure option I'd like to
implement the internals with EXEC GUILE
...
END-EXEC

(we have ocesql for 'code method' scaffolding now, so yayys)

Once that is in place, along with having Guiles' LISP and ECMAScript
(and bf, but I doubt an auditor would appreciate decoding bf in a
financial application) we'll have a framework to implement just about
any

EXEC engine ... END-EXEC

paragraphs that we can imagine.

Patrick; keep thinking along these lines.  There may well be a GNU
Cobol ->  Node.js emitter someday.  But for the now, C and C++ are
options, and once FUNCTION-ID is ubiquitous, a lot of need for CALL
can be removed as well.

Things like

MOVE FUNCTION PASCAL-SUB(args) TO COBOL-VAR

is just over the horizon.

And I'll ditto VBISAM. I'd like to pester Trevor to see if he'd be up
for GNU-ification  of VBISAM, and then let it loose on the world as
well, released along with GNU Cobol source tree.

Cheers,
Brian

On 10/4/13, Sergey Kashyrin<address@hidden>  wrote:
VBISAM

We just need a people who can fix some locking issues on unix.

Cheers,
SK

On 10/4/2013 10:46 PM, Michael Potter wrote:
I think getting rid of BDB is a great idea.

It would make OpenCOBOL more commercially viable to implement this
interface:
http://supportline.microfocus.com/documentation/books/sx20books/fhexfh.htm

Microfocus allows their users to replace their file handler by
implementing to that specification.

Fujitsu and COBOL-IT implemented the same interface for the compilers
they sell.

My implementing that interface, it would make it easier for people to
port from those compilers to OpenCOBOL.

I have implemented a couple of file handlers that "plug in" to
microfocus.  Their system works well.

Note: I am giving credit to microfocus for inventing this interface,
but I have the feeling it was invented somewhere else.

The implementation would go something like this:
1) Implement EXTFH interface in OpenCOBOL.
2) Implement EXTFH wrapping BDB.

as this point existing user could continue to use the BDB data, but
have the flexibility to add new EXTFH that access data in other backends.

I had one of my programmers replace BDB in OpenCOBOL so I could be
compatible with MicroFocus as part of my OpenKicks framework.  It
would make a good starting point for this effort.  We basically wrote
a library with same interface as BDB and linked it into OpenCOBOL.
   Don't get your hopes up that it will be very useful for this effort.

I will look into making that open source so you can use it in
OpenCOBOL, much like I open sourced EZASOKET
http://code.google.com/p/ezasoket/.


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Patrick
<address@hidden
<mailto:address@hidden>>  wrote:

      On 10/04/2013 04:31 PM, Michael Anderson wrote:
      >  On 10/04/2013 02:42 PM, Patrick wrote:
      >>  I did say that I was just hoping to have a theoretical chat and
      that I
      >>  was not saying we had to change anything. Calling my comments
      >>  ridiculous isn't very chatty
      >  Sorry Patrick, I am often hurtfull in my choice of words, I
      didn't mean
      >  to ofend you, or anyone.
      >  But you're a are right, it does not enable a good theoretical chat.
      >  I'll try to choose better words in the future.
      >
      >  --
      >  Mike.
      >  We are all sharing this planet together, we should all try
      harder to get
      >  along.
      >
      Hi Mike

      Not to worry.

      I keep doing this over and over again, I have to learn.

      I don't have any friends, co-workers or family that I can talk about
      programming with.

      I bet I have posted to more then 40 different mailing lists over the
      past 7 years.

      Every time I just want to just chat things go bad. I guess mailing
      lists
      are for black&  white, "how is this done" sort of questions and
      not just
      friendly coffee time like chatter.

      Have a great day !





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      October Webinars: Code for Performance
      Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
      Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get
      the most from
      the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and
      register>

http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
      _______________________________________________
      open-cobol-list mailing list
      address@hidden
      <mailto:address@hidden>
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-cobol-list




--
Michael Potter
    Tapp Solutions, LLC
    Replatform Technologies, LLC
+1 770 815 6142  ** Atlanta ** address@hidden
<mailto:address@hidden>   ** www.linkedin.com/in/michaelpotter
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelpotter>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most
from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk


_______________________________________________
open-cobol-list mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-cobol-list

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register>
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
open-cobol-list mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-cobol-list


--
David Lee Lambert
Member ACM (address@hidden)
Ph# (616)676-7375  *  IM: davidleelambert (Yahoo!, Skype and Google Talk)
"Justicia, Tierra y Libertad"



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]