[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A proposed Roadmap
From: |
jemarch |
Subject: |
Re: A proposed Roadmap |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:13:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.1.50 (powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
We actually have a project for write a GNU kernel, and it is
partially written. We dont have projects writing replacements for
TeX or XWindow.
But our project to write a kernel started _before_ Linux, so this
point is moot. When GNU was started, TeX and X already existed. If
Linux had existed before our attempt to create a kernel, then I am
quite sure that we would have used Linux.
I share that oppinion. I also am quite sure we would have used
Linux. I am talking about the actual situation, when there is Linux
and a partly written GNU kernel. I see quite positive polithical
advantages (more than technical ones) in having a GNU kernel given the
actual situation, that is all.
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, (continued)
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/18
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, jemarch, 2007/09/18
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, R. Steven Rainwater, 2007/09/18
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/24
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Michael Banck, 2007/09/24
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/25
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/18
- Re: A proposed Roadmap,
jemarch <=
- Why Hurd? (was: Re: A proposed Roadmap), olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/18
- Re: Why Hurd? (was: Re: A proposed Roadmap), Michael Heath, 2007/09/18
- Re: Why Hurd? (was: Re: A proposed Roadmap), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/18