[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A proposed Roadmap
From: |
R. Steven Rainwater |
Subject: |
Re: A proposed Roadmap |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:43:23 -0500 |
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 15:20, address@hidden wrote:
> If Linux were a GNU package, it would be GPLv3 by now.
Reading that made me curious. I just checked the Hurd CVS. Gnumach,
hurd, and mig are licensed under the GPLv2. I couldn't tell on hurd-l4
as there is no COPYING file and the code comments don't mention what
version of the GPL is used.
Is there currently a plan to move gnumach and the Hurd to GPLv3?
-Steve
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, (continued)
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Tom Bachmann, 2007/09/10
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/14
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, jemarch, 2007/09/14
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/17
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/18
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/24
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Dave Crossland, 2007/09/24
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/18
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, jemarch, 2007/09/18
- Re: A proposed Roadmap,
R. Steven Rainwater <=
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/24
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Michael Banck, 2007/09/24
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/25
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/18
- Re: A proposed Roadmap, jemarch, 2007/09/18
- Why Hurd? (was: Re: A proposed Roadmap), olafBuddenhagen, 2007/09/18
- Re: Why Hurd? (was: Re: A proposed Roadmap), Michael Heath, 2007/09/18
- Re: Why Hurd? (was: Re: A proposed Roadmap), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/18