[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU Crypto] Re: GCJ build
From: |
Raif S. Naffah |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU Crypto] Re: GCJ build |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:11:51 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
hello Olivier,
On Thursday 24 October 2002 22:31, Olivier LF wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:05:33PM +1000, Raif S. Naffah wrote:
> > that's a very good point! should we do the same for the top level
> > directory too?
>
> I'd say yes.
ok. i'll add the Makfile.in to the cvs tree this weekend.
> > doesn't the user need to have LIBTOOL anyway to use the gcj/ tools?
> > doesn't including the Makefile.in as you point out in the previous
> > part of the message enough to address the needs for people who want
> > to just compile sources?
>
> ...
>
> The LIBTOOL step cannot be skiped otherwise the resulting Makefile
> has syntax errors in it.
>
> I can't remember the exact problem but from the top of my head you
> get something like that:
>
>
> Makefile.am includes the offending:
>
> lib_LTLIBRARIES = lib-gnu-crypto.la
> ...
> ...
are you saying that even if we put those lines inside a:
if USE_GCJ
lib_LTLIBRARIES = lib-gnu-crypto.la
...
...
endif #USE_GCJ
we still end up with a broken Makefile?
> At the time I gave up! Considering that Ant is so simple (and fast)
> to use, I decided it didn't worse the effort and time, and went on
> using Ant scripts for bytecode compilation and specific GCJ
> Makefile.am for GCJ native compilation.
worst case scenario: we already have the build trilogy (ant + 2*make);
and they do the job.
best case scenario: we end up with ant + make, and less files and
procedures to worry about when building.
cheers;
rsn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Que du magnifique
iD8DBQE9uSb3+e1AKnsTRiERA5DUAKDc0bC54ohrmz6njSaosky1tr5T4ACeOcnz
QKtKBQz832dOHMeajp8FJLE=
=nq3z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [GNU Crypto] MD2 hash, Mark Wielaard, 2002/10/18
- Re: [GNU Crypto] MD2 hash, Casey Marshall, 2002/10/20
- Re: [GNU Crypto] MD2 hash, Raif S. Naffah, 2002/10/20
- Re: [GNU Crypto] MD2 hash, Casey Marshall, 2002/10/22
- Re: [GNU Crypto] MD2 hash, Raif S. Naffah, 2002/10/22
- Re: GCJ build (was Re: [GNU Crypto] MD2 hash), Olivier LF, 2002/10/22
- Re: GCJ build (was Re: [GNU Crypto] MD2 hash), Raif S. Naffah, 2002/10/23
- [GNU Crypto] Re: GCJ build, Olivier LF, 2002/10/24
- Re: [GNU Crypto] Re: GCJ build,
Raif S. Naffah <=
- Re: [GNU Crypto] Re: GCJ build, Raif S. Naffah, 2002/10/25
- Re: [GNU Crypto] Re: GCJ build, Olivier LF, 2002/10/26
- Re: [GNU Crypto] Re: GCJ build, Raif S. Naffah, 2002/10/27
- Re: [GNU Crypto] Re: GCJ build, Olivier LF, 2002/10/27
- Re: [GNU Crypto] Re: GCJ build, Raif S. Naffah, 2002/10/27
- Re: [GNU Crypto] MD2 hash, Casey Marshall, 2002/10/25
- Re: [GNU Crypto] MD2 hash, Raif S. Naffah, 2002/10/25