[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: FEATURE PLANS: pruning instead of configs
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: FEATURE PLANS: pruning instead of configs |
Date: |
26 May 2004 17:31:47 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> I do like the idea. Sending patches by email is a common task,
> and it would even be superb if tla could pass proper message IDs
> along so that *-patch-nnn would result in a proper thread:)
While I think that tla should be divided into a "core" and a "UI", I'm not
going to comment on that side of the question.
But regarding the `tla commit --announce' thingy, I think an important part
of sending a patch to a maintainer is not just the patch and its changelog,
but also a motivating explanation, so I'd like to see the
The user should have the opportunity to edit the body
of this email (perhaps via editting the log message)
expended a bit to provide more flexible ways to edit the text and to
recognize that a log message is different from a "motivating explanation".
Stefan
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] FEATURE PLANS: pruning instead of configs, James Blackwell, 2004/05/25