[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:06:23 -0700 (PDT) |
Just wanted to underscore this very good point:
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> False matches in a source tree is a problem that's unlikely to
> go away soon; it's not just {arch}/CVS/.svn, but also editor
> backup files, build cruft (even if you build in a separate dir,
> autoconf _still_ puts crap in your source tree), etc. `tla
> inventory' is a pretty good way to deal with this for arch
> source trees I suppose;
Especially the "I suppose" part :-)
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] {arch} directory, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Doran Moppert, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Samuel Tardieu, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, David Brown, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/24