[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml? |
Date: |
25 Sep 2003 11:00:31 +0900 |
Karel Gardas <address@hidden> writes:
> Maybe they still think that Arch is just slow... and yes, I'm afraid
> BK is still clear winner in term of performance when working on the
> large source trees
I wonder how true this is, actually; has anyone timed them on
comparable hardware?
-Miles
--
`...the Soviet Union was sliding in to an economic collapse so comprehensive
that in the end its factories produced not goods but bads: finished products
less valuable than the raw materials they were made from.' [The Economist]
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: log-buf-len dynamic (fwd), Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Adam Spiers, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Inertia on lkml?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Momchil Velikov, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/25
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/24