[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory |
Date: |
25 Sep 2003 10:55:14 +0900 |
Adam Spiers <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm with you on this, and I think it deserves more attention that
> classifying as a "very minor issue". I have done countless
> finds/greps/globs etc. over the years that have required the RCS/CVS
> directories to be pruned and while it's not an enormous cost for a
> once-off, it does add up.
But note that the problem doesn't go away if you use dot files -- the
canonical way of doing recursive find/greps is to use `.' (`find .',
`grep -r FOO .', etc), which match dot-files just like any other.
False matches in a source tree is a problem that's unlikely to go away
soon; it's not just {arch}/CVS/.svn, but also editor backup files, build
cruft (even if you build in a separate dir, autoconf _still_ puts crap
in your source tree), etc. `tla inventory' is a pretty good way to deal
with this for arch source trees I suppose; I wish cvs had something
similar (I guess you can do "cvs -nq update | sed '/^[?]/d;s/^..//'",
but that contacts the server...).
-Miles
--
Next to fried food, the South has suffered most from oratory.
-- Walter Hines Page
- [Gnu-arch-users] {arch} directory, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Doran Moppert, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Samuel Tardieu, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, David Brown, 2003/09/24