|
From: | Dustin Sallings |
Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory |
Date: | Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:25:47 -0700 |
On Wednesday, Sep 24, 2003, at 12:06 US/Pacific, Tom Lord wrote:
true, it's served well on unix for a long time to name directories that the user normally shouldn't have to interact with starting with a dot. CVS broke this but it so rarely caused a problem due to the nature of the directory's content .. but with arch it obviously (going by the list traffic) causes a lotof discomfort.That's funny. I've reached the opposite conclusion from list traffic.
I agree that .arch-ids is a lot more pleasant than CVS, but {arch} isn't necessarily any better. It's still visible and globs still match it.
-- Dustin Sallings
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |