[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tree-sitter and Android port
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: tree-sitter and Android port |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:33:20 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
> I’ve looked at this before. The “uncompiled grammar file”, grammar.c,
> not only contains static data, but also functions. Some language also
> requires a scanner.cc <http://scanner.cc/> file which contains
> nontrivial functions. So to “interpret” the grammar file you
> essentially need a C (and sometimes even C++) compiler.
Is there any chance of this situation changing?
In the future, we will see more and more systems where these kinds of
restrictions are common, so it would be a good idea for a solution to be
found. Thanks.
Re: Android port, tomas, 2023/02/17
tree-sitter and Android port, Po Lu, 2023/02/20
Re: Android port, Po Lu, 2023/02/21
Re: Android port, Angelo Graziosi, 2023/02/18
- Re: Android port, Po Lu, 2023/02/18
- Re: Android port, Angelo Graziosi, 2023/02/18
- Re: Android port, Po Lu, 2023/02/18
- Re: Android port, Angelo Graziosi, 2023/02/19
- Re: Android port, Dov Grobgeld, 2023/02/19
- Re: Android port, Michael Albinus, 2023/02/19
- Re: Android port, Po Lu, 2023/02/19
- Re: Android port, Michael Albinus, 2023/02/19