[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about start-process and argument list
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: Question about start-process and argument list |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Feb 2023 10:22:05 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.9+54 (af2080d) (2022-11-21) |
> > compatible with any possible way to quote and parse arguments on a
> > command line on any possible OS
I do not consider above statement logically related to your statement
below. Maybe I have taken it out of context, but I consider that above
statement may apply to `start-process' but not to
`start-process-shell-command' exactly to avoid problems with quoting.
> Kind of sounds like I should be using `start-process-shell-command'
> again! As I understand it, this is its main selling point.
That one has problems with quoting!
Use `start-process' or `call-process'
--
Jean
Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
In support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/
- Question about start-process and argument list, Eric Abrahamsen, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Jean Louis, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Bruno Barbier, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Eric Abrahamsen, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, chad, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Eric Abrahamsen, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Bruno Barbier, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Eric Abrahamsen, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, tomas, 2023/02/04
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list,
Jean Louis <=
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Eric Abrahamsen, 2023/02/04
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Jean Louis, 2023/02/04
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Eric Abrahamsen, 2023/02/04