[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about start-process and argument list
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: Question about start-process and argument list |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Feb 2023 14:24:24 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.9+54 (af2080d) (2022-11-21) |
* Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> [2023-02-03 09:37]:
> I recently got a bug report about the Mairix search engine for Gnus --
> long story short, the gnus-search.el code calls all command-line mail
> indexers (notmuch, mairix, namazu, etc) like this:
>
> (apply #'start-process (format "search-%s" server)
> buffer program cp-list)
>
> Where `program' is the indexer, and `cp-list' is a list of command-line
> flags. The important thing is that the last element of `cp-list' is the
> search-query string itself, but this string has not been split on
> spaces. Meaning that cp-list could look like:
I would not try to generalize the command for all search engines
unless they really have compatible command lie.
> '("--rcfile" config-file "-r" "another-arg" "from:bob subject:lunch")
Which is OK in itself, as it is safer to run program without using
external shell.
> Other search engines seem to accept this fine, but Mairix fails unless
> the search query is also split on spaces:
>
> '("--rcfile" config-file "-r" "another-arg" "from:bob" "subject:lunch")
>
> It occurred to me that this is probably the way it should be done, even
> if the other engines don't happen to be choking on the format. I have
> two questions:
>
> 1. What does the program actually see, in this case? Is the first
> example above, is it the equivalent of (on the command line) wrapping
> the query in double quotes?
It has same effect.
> 2. Should I be using `start-process-shell-command' instead? The docs
> mention that the main difference is that it will use shell features,
> which aren't really relevant here, but maybe it's the right thing to
> do, semantically.
Rather no, as that becomes unsafe. Yes, it would invoke shell and
some environment and the program line. But for programing purposes is
unsafe.
I learned it from experience ahat `start-process' and `call-process'
are safe way and more conclusive for programming purposes.
--
Jean
Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
In support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/
- Question about start-process and argument list, Eric Abrahamsen, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list,
Jean Louis <=
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Bruno Barbier, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Eric Abrahamsen, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, chad, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Eric Abrahamsen, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Bruno Barbier, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Eric Abrahamsen, 2023/02/03
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, tomas, 2023/02/04
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Jean Louis, 2023/02/04
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Eric Abrahamsen, 2023/02/04
- Re: Question about start-process and argument list, Jean Louis, 2023/02/04