[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: feature/package-vc has been merged
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: feature/package-vc has been merged |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Nov 2022 19:00:08 -0800 |
Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis@me.com> writes:
> And speaking of `-autoremove', should we also add `-vc-autoremove'?
My concern is that it seems easy to accidentally delete some changes
hidden away in a branch or stash. Or even on the master/main branch.
Should such a command double check that no local changes exist before
autoremoving, and ask for an additional confirmation if that is the
case, perhaps?
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged, (continued)
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/10
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2022/11/11
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/12
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2022/11/12
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2022/11/12
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/12
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2022/11/13
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged,
Stefan Kangas <=
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2022/11/13
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/13
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2022/11/13
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/14
- Re: feature/package-vc has been merged, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/12