[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:40:51 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, linux) |
>>>>> "os" == Oliver Scholz <address@hidden> writes:
os> The GPL FAQ seems to see two orthogonal issues here. I
os> believe, from its point of view every person is automatically
os> granted with the rights covered by the GPL, provided, of
os> course, that a person can get hold of a copy.
That's what clause 0 of the GPL says. Whether it would stand up in
court in case of theft is another matter.
os> The entitlement happens for everybody as soon as the software
os> is released. Stealing is a separate issue, which does not
os> affect the copyright aspect.
That's right, for parts of the work already GPLed.
However, if there is any proprietary (ie, not specifically licensed
under the GPL) code included, then it is _not_ covered by the GPL. As
long as you have not distributed that code, you retain copyright, ie,
all rights, by default. Since you haven't distributed, you have done
nothing to require that your code be GPLed, even if you have accepted
the GPL itself (eg, by past redistribution of verbatim copies). So
you can sue the thief under copyright law, and you can reclaim copies
from third parties.
I think this preserves all the rights to "work-in-progress" that David
is worried about.
os> I wonder whether that particular case is different again. I
os> wonder whether your code actually _can_ be covered by the GPL,
os> before you deliver it to anybody.
Yes, it can. See clause 0. This could be useful: suppose you get hit
by a train. Your heirs sell your notebooks _but not the copyrights_
to a library, and now anyone who reads them may copy and publish
because it's under the GPL. Very hypothetical, of course.
os> Maybe I will ask my flat mate.
Please do. :-)
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, (continued)
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/16
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, David Kastrup, 2003/09/16
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/17
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, David Kastrup, 2003/09/17
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/18
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, David Kastrup, 2003/09/18
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/18
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, David Kastrup, 2003/09/18
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, Oliver Scholz, 2003/09/19
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, David Kastrup, 2003/09/19
- Message not available
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/19
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/19
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, Kevin Ryde, 2003/09/20
- Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, Frank Schmitt, 2003/09/16
Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/09/12
Re: May I publish a Windows Installer for GNU Emacs?, Frank Schmitt, 2003/09/12