Am 13.06.20 um 00:35 schrieb Matias Fonzo:
I understood that you want Qire's ability in Qi, but I also understood
that for a better understanding of both things we should unify or
extend
with appropriate languages since the package managing is something
complex, as Qi currently works well, maybe there is no need to rewrite
Qi now (and I hope not :-).
Well, I wasn't meaning to imply that Qi should explicitly include the
ability to do what Qire does. I was just trying to say that I think Qi
should be the way the user invokes those things. I.e., Qi should be
able
to make use of Qire seamlessly if that is possible.
The point of having only one command leads to think that Qi could
invoke
the "extensions" of Qire, by this I meant part of Qire, not the whole
interface, taking into account everything Qi already has, including
the
documentation format.
This has the advantage that parts of "Qi" will be in
Fennel/Scheme/Lips
or whatever, while in the future parts or modes of Qi could be
replaced
in the same language (if needed).
On the other hand, we still don't know how users will interact using
qi
and qire, it might be positive (I hope).
Sorry, but this confuses me even more.
Could you explain the relation of Qi and Qire how you currently
envision
it for Dragora 3 once again as if you were trying to explain it to
someone who has no prior knowledge of those things? That will surely
help to cure my confusion.