|
From: | Riccardo Mottola |
Subject: | Re: Package building |
Date: | Sat, 23 Nov 2019 15:48:48 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
Hi, On 11/20/19 12:28 PM, David Chisnall wrote:
I'm happy to take contributions for the assembly paths for other architectures. We currently have:- x86-32 - x86-64 - AArch32 - AArch64 - MIPS (at least n64 works, I think o32 and n32 are there but untested).I passionately hate PowerPC assembly, so will definitely not write that myself, but anyone who wants to add it is very welcome to do so. I will probably get around to adding RISC-V support at some point.
this list only lacks in my interest:- MIPS LittleEndian (as soon as I get the small project with Nikolaus actually do something useful) or is your implementation already endian-independent?
- PPC32 (the only thing I have access to) and PPC64 to be accepted by the mainstream users today
- SPARC32 and SPARC64sadly, it has been ages I touched PPC (which as much as I love CPU concept, always hated when working in assembly) and SPARC code, but it would be a nice addition.
On both PPC and SPARC I only use GCC, but... if that works, I'd be tickled to work lower level again.
Riccardo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |