[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Package building
From: |
Umberto Cerrato |
Subject: |
Re: Package building |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Nov 2019 19:15:11 +0000 |
Please join the Discord. I’m interested in your experience with ppc and ppc64.
One day I’ll need some help in installing GS in ppc64be (and el) Debian.
Cheers,
Umberto
> Il giorno 24 nov 2019, alle ore 19:50, Bertrand Dekoninck
> <bertrand.dekoninck@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>
>> Le 23 nov. 2019 à 15:48, Riccardo Mottola <riccardo.mottola@libero.it> a
>> écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>> On 11/20/19 12:28 PM, David Chisnall wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm happy to take contributions for the assembly paths for other
>>> architectures. We currently have:
>>>
>>> - x86-32
>>> - x86-64
>>> - AArch32
>>> - AArch64
>>> - MIPS (at least n64 works, I think o32 and n32 are there but untested).
>>>
>>> I passionately hate PowerPC assembly, so will definitely not write that
>>> myself, but anyone who wants to add it is very welcome to do so. I will
>>> probably get around to adding RISC-V support at some point.
>>
>>
>> this list only lacks in my interest:
>>
>> - MIPS LittleEndian (as soon as I get the small project with Nikolaus
>> actually do something useful) or is your implementation already
>> endian-independent?
>>
>> - PPC32 (the only thing I have access to) and PPC64 to be accepted by the
>> mainstream users today
>>
>> - SPARC32 and SPARC64
>>
>>
>> sadly, it has been ages I touched PPC (which as much as I love CPU concept,
>> always hated when working in assembly) and SPARC code, but it would be a
>> nice addition.
>>
>> On both PPC and SPARC I only use GCC, but... if that works, I'd be tickled
>> to work lower level again.
>>
>> Riccardo
>>
>>
>
> I’m happy to see how such a sensitive topic (compilers…) does progress these
> days. And I’d really be very happy if the gnustep runtime could run on ppc
> (both 32 and 64).
>
> Last time I tried (on debian 8 ppc32, 1 year ago or even more ?) it failed,
> and I was alone with my questions. The problem was not only the assembly bits
> (as David said, there is a slower alternative) but some problem with clang (I
> don’t remember…). I’d be happy to help here and test again. I can’t code any
> assembly, but I can test on PPC32 and PPC64. I fear I need to install debian
> sid on my machines, which is a pain for now. I know you (Ricardo) did
> install it on a powerbook. Can we have a decent X11 session there, and a
> decent compiler ? If we can build libobjc on this system, then it’ll be
> assembly coding time.
>
> Which is the oldest version of Clang mandatory to build the gnustep runtime
> (1.9 and 2.0) ? Do we need a specific linker ? I would like to avoid clang’s
> build and use the distro’s one.
>
> Bertrand
>
>
>
>
- Re: Package building, (continued)
- Re: Package building, David Chisnall, 2019/11/20
- Re: Package building, Ivan Vučica, 2019/11/20
- Re: Package building, Johannes Brakensiek, 2019/11/20
- Re: Package building, Andreas Fink, 2019/11/20
- Re: Package building, Ivan Vučica, 2019/11/20
- Re: Package building, Riccardo Mottola, 2019/11/23
- Re: Package building, David Chisnall, 2019/11/20
- Re: Package building, Riccardo Mottola, 2019/11/23
- Re: Package building, David Chisnall, 2019/11/23
- Re: Package building, Bertrand Dekoninck, 2019/11/24
- Re: Package building,
Umberto Cerrato <=
- Re: Package building, James Carthew, 2019/11/24
- Re: Package building, Riccardo Mottola, 2019/11/29
- Re: Package building, cobjective, 2019/11/20
- Re: Package building, David Chisnall, 2019/11/21
- Re: Package building, Sergii Stoian, 2019/11/21
- Re: Package building, Fred Kiefer, 2019/11/21
- Re: Package building, Sergii Stoian, 2019/11/21
- Re: Package building, cobjective, 2019/11/19
- Re: Package building, Ivan Vučica, 2019/11/19
- Re: Package building, cobjective, 2019/11/20