discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Questions about E100


From: Alexander Chemeris
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Questions about E100
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 10:36:25 +0400

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 02:03, Philip Balister <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 05/06/2011 05:07 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
>>
>> On 05/06/2011 04:51 PM, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 16:29, Philip Balister<address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 05/05/2011 05:42 PM, Scott Johnston wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anybody out there done any development on the DSP? What tools are
>>>>> available to program it? I have used TI's code composer in the past to
>>>>> program DSPs, is there something comparable to that included with E100,
>>>>> or is it easy to get it? What I would like to be able to do is obtain
>>>>> common C libraries and compile C code to run on the DSP.
>>>>
>>>> You can build an image with dsp support by following the notes at:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://ettus-apps.sourcerepo.com/redmine/ettus/projects/usrpe1xx/wiki/Install_OpenEmbedded
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll post a copy of the image next week.
>>>>
>>>> To run the demos, you'll need to modify the kernel boot args to create a
>>>> memory hole. This is (barely) documented on the interwebs. Next time I
>>>> update u-boot, I'll include an extra variable to make it easier to
>>>> create
>>>> the memory hole.
>>>
>>> On a related question - have anyone tried SysLink on Gumstix/E100?
>>>
>>> I'm just getting into this staff and trying to understand what tools
>>> are the best to use for DSP on OMAP/DaVinci/Integra.
>>>
>>
>> Good question :)
>>
>> More information on syslink is here:
>>
>> http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Category:SysLink
>>
>> I see a recipe to make syslink in OE, but it pulls from a git repo. I'll
>> ask what sort of state it is in.
>
> Apparently there is no official syslink for OMAP3 at the moment. This may
> change in the future. Sounds like you should focus on dsplink for now.

Weird. Why do they mention OMAP3530 as an example of Syslink target here?
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Category:SysLink
and mention some OMAP3530 executables here?
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/SysLink_UserGuide


-- 
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]