[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package
From: |
Ivan Raikov |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:38:26 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
I see. Thanks for the explanation, John! Well, I have added the
Debian files to the dist target in Makefile.am (it was a trivial
change), and I will be more than happy to make the necessary additions
to the CMake build file. I don't mind working with whatever is the
currently favored build tool. By the way, I am curious what was the
problem with using Autoconf/Automake under MinGW? I ported a fairly
complex distributed computing toolkit to MinGW last month, and the
only GNU-related problem I saw was that libtool somehow gets confused
when the source directory includes spaces (like "Documents and
Settings"). In fact, I was pleasantly surprised how painless things
were.
-Ivan
John Cowan <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Brandon is overstating the case. CMake is now the only supported build
> method *on Windows* (excluding Cygwin). It works, as far as is known,
> on Linux platforms, but is not yet the only supported method. Only Felix
> can declare that event, and he has not.
>
> For now, building via Automake/Autoconf is still supported. Of course,
> the more Linux people learn to build with CMake, the closer the day
> comes when Automake/Autoconf can be junked, which Felix has stated is
> his intention.
>
> (Sorry if I'm misrepresenting you, Felix, but I thought this should
> be said.)
--
"I grew convinced that truth, sincerity and integrity in dealings
between man and man were of the utmost importance to the felicity of
life, and I formed a written resolution to practice them ever while I
lived."
-Benjamin Franklin, The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin
- [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1), (continued)
- [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1), Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/09
- [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1), Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1), felix winkelmann, 2006/12/10
- [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/10
- [Chicken-hackers] Re: Debian package, felix winkelmann, 2006/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, John Cowan, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package,
Ivan Raikov <=
- [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/11
- [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, John Cowan, 2006/12/11
- [Chicken-hackers] binary distros, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] binary distros, John Cowan, 2006/12/17
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Toby Butzon, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Thomas Christian Chust, 2006/12/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, felix winkelmann, 2006/12/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/12