[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:54:59 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Brandon J. Van Every scripsit:
> This is getting way too confusing. In fact, while in the shower, I
> decided it's time to edit all the READMEs to reflect one consistent
> message. And all the wiki pages, and also have little blurbs every time
> someone runs ./configure.
Excellent.
> - CMake is the canonical method by which Chicken DISTRIBUTIONS are
> created. If you want to modify the canonical distro, you have to work
> with CMake.
*Source* distributions, that is. Binary distributions can still be
built either way, unless they are based on MSVC.
> Not looking for people to run off in the Autoconf-only direction
> anymore.
Amen.
--
A poetical purist named Cowan [that's me: address@hidden
Once put the rest of us dowan. [on xml-dev]
"Your verse would be sweeter http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
If it only had metre
And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan." [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay
- [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, (continued)
- [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/10
- [Chicken-hackers] Re: Debian package, felix winkelmann, 2006/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, John Cowan, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/11
- [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/11
- [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf,
John Cowan <=
- [Chicken-hackers] binary distros, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] binary distros, John Cowan, 2006/12/17
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Toby Butzon, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Thomas Christian Chust, 2006/12/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, felix winkelmann, 2006/12/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, felix winkelmann, 2006/12/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1), Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1), Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1), felix winkelmann, 2006/12/10