[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable
From: |
Ivan Raikov |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1) |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:39:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Alright, I will make sure that I can build Debian packages out of
the Chicken 2.5 source, and I will commit the Debian scripts to the
repository, with the new description. Can anyone tell me what's
involved in maintaining a working Texinfo file?
"Brandon J. Van Every" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Felix made a decision to stop providing Texinfo documentation.
> Perhaps you should talk to him about reinstating it, and helping with
> that? I've had my own issues with "how easy is it to build a distro
> with docs?" now that everything is going wiki-oriented. I'm not
> exactly up on it now... don't really want to be, either. I'd help
> patch the CMake build any way it needs to be done, but I don't want to
> drop what I'm doing and chase this problem.
>
> What am I worried about right now? Well, I'm fed up with XEmacs, and
> I don't like Eclipse either. When I try to use MinGW with it, it just
> doesn't work, and I'm tired of chasing broken crap projects. Eclipse
> is fine for the things people use it for, actually quite good, but it
> doesn't look like it's a powerhouse of MinGW compatibility. So I'm
> looking at various open source MinGW IDEs, with an eye to integrating
> Chicken and CMake support. Currently I'm looking at Ultimate++ as the
> guinea pig.
>
> Yeah, I'd need to see it in Darcs to bother with it. But, I cannot be
> a Debian maintainer. I have no Linux and don't plan to have one any
> time soon. I don't feel good about checking anything into Darcs
> without testing, so I'll leave that to someone with the means and
> gumption to do it.
>
> I would simply lift Chicken's description from the homepage:
>
> "CHICKEN is a compiler for the Scheme programming language. CHICKEN
> produces portable, efficient C, supports almost all of the current
> Scheme language standard, R5RS and includes many enhancements and
> extensions. CHICKEN runs on MacOS X, Windows, and many Unix flavours."
- [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1), Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/08
- [Chicken-hackers] Re: Debian Chicken blurb, Kon Lovett, 2006/12/08
- [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1), Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/09
- [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1), Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1),
Ivan Raikov <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.41 for Debian stable (3.1), felix winkelmann, 2006/12/10
- [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/10
- [Chicken-hackers] Re: Debian package, felix winkelmann, 2006/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, John Cowan, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Debian package, Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/11
- [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake vs. Autoconf, Ivan Raikov, 2006/12/11