[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Alternative weights files

From: Joseph Heled
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Alternative weights files
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:11:55 +1200

You should use -q1, where matches are played in pairs, and in each
game the same dice are fed (reversed) to the two players.
That way, if the two players make the same choices, you eliminate luck
completely :). If not, you reduce its effect.

But now you have 1/2 the trials, with 3 outcomes per trial, -,0,+ (X
winds both, they split, O wins both), so the stats will be different.

But I would repeat with a -q1. 50.69% is huge. I don't expect it to go away.


On 19 September 2012 09:05, Philippe Michel <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Joseph Heled wrote:
>> when running the matches, did you use either -q or --q1 on the command
>> line ??
> I didn't. Looking at the whole script now, it looks like it may have been
> useful.
> I don't understand python code very well. Does -q use duplicate dice at
> match granularity and -q1 for each game ?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]