[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Alternative weights files

From: Thomas A. Moulton
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Alternative weights files
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:51:54 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20120726 Icedove/3.0.11

If you want to run gnubg vs gnubg (old vs new) we could run a test via FIBS.

It would be a lot slower than machine to machine...

On 09/18/2012 06:54 AM, Joseph Heled wrote:
Hi all,

Just in case you are unaware of it, my code does not reflect gnubg
playing ability per-se, since it uses its own cube decision code.
Move selection is similar, but not identical either. Nobody ever
really compared the two approaches.

Also, just out of curiosity, why do you think 1M is statistically significant?


On 18 September 2012 18:51, Philippe Michel<address@hidden>  wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Joseph Heled wrote:

What did you use to play those 1M games?

This was with your gnubg-nn/scripts/play/matchplay.py script.
Bug-gnubg mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]