[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Alternative weights files

From: Joseph Heled
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Alternative weights files
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:14:25 +1200

when running the matches, did you use either -q or --q1 on the command line ??


On 19 September 2012 08:10, Philippe Michel <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Joseph Heled wrote:
>> Just in case you are unaware of it, my code does not reflect gnubg
>> playing ability per-se, since it uses its own cube decision code.
>> Move selection is similar, but not identical either. Nobody ever
>> really compared the two approaches.
> Regarding cube decisions, you have reminded it repeatedly, but I wasn't
> aware for the checker play.
>> Also, just out of curiosity, why do you think 1M is statistically
>> significant?
> 1M is nothing special besides a round number, but 50.19% is about 4 standard
> deviations above 50%, isn't it ?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]