[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Alternative weights files

From: Joseph Heled
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Alternative weights files
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:05:28 +1200


What did you use to play those 1M games?


On 18 September 2012 10:54, Philippe Michel <address@hidden> wrote:
> I have uploaded new weights at
> http://www.gnubg.org/media/nn-training/pmichel/nets/20120907/
> The difference since what I posted in June is mostly further training of the
> contact net, and this time the result is statistically significantly better
> than the current nets.
> new @ 0ply won 50.19% of 5 pts matches against current @ 0ply (1M trials)
> new @ 2ply won 50.69% of 5 pts matches against current @ 2ply (100k trials)
> The latter, if not an outlier, would be a great result. A possible
> explanation for the bigger improvement compared to 0ply could be that with
> the new nets, 1ply evaluation works adequately (wins 52.8% of 10k 5ptrs
> against 0ply) when it is apparently not the case with the current nets.
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]