[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Bug-gnubg] Proposed patches to the gnubg sources

From: macherius
Subject: RE: [Bug-gnubg] Proposed patches to the gnubg sources
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:05:54 +0100

> > weird stuff like gcc for Sinix on MIPS. Checkout, compile and face 
> > dozens of unnecessary warnings and errors. Is it really required to 
> > have such oddities, in particular where the patches to gnubg are 
> > there, and come at no cost?
> I'm not that bothered to be fair.  Perhaps if the #if also 
> checked _MSC_VER - i.e. is the microsoft compiler being used 
> it would be ok.
Fine with me, all I want is a clean compile right after CVS checkout. I'd
opt to also add the Intel compiler, which defines "__INTEL_COMPILER". I'll
submit a patch checking for both Windows  compilers here soon. That would
then replace the pending patch submitted earlier w/r to the OpenGL includes.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]