[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0
From: |
Bob Paddock |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 8 May 2009 20:54:33 -0400 |
>> 1) -no-inline-small-function - 69034
>> 2) --param inline-call-cost=2 - 68964
>> 3) -fno-inline - 68816
>> 4) -finline-limit=10 - 68810
>> 5) #2 & #4 - 68754 6) -finline-limit=3 -
>> 68754 (same results for 1,2 and 3)
>
> I found that it depends on your source codes
> To get better code size, you have to try different switches combinations.
Is there any way to apply the switches on a per source file basis?
--
http://www.wearablesmartsensors.com/
http://www.softwaresafety.net/
http://www.designer-iii.com/
http://www.unusualresearch.com/
- [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Sean D'Epagnier, 2009/05/06
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Steven Michalske, 2009/05/06
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, David Kelly, 2009/05/06
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Weddington, Eric, 2009/05/06
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Sean D'Epagnier, 2009/05/07
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Schwichtenberg, Knut, 2009/05/07
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Kang Tin LAI, 2009/05/07
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0,
Bob Paddock <=
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Weddington, Eric, 2009/05/08
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Rolf Ebert, 2009/05/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Bob Paddock, 2009/05/09