[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0 |
Date: |
Wed, 6 May 2009 14:01:25 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Sean D'Epagnier
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 12:45 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0
>
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to reduce the size of my binary so it would fit on some
> 128kb parts. I normally used gcc 4.2.2 for this project, but decided
> to try gcc 4.5.0. To my surprise, the resulting binary was 3.5kb
> _larger_ with the newer gcc. This is a serious bug imho and should be
> fixed. I'm not quite sure why it did occur, but I have some guesses.
> I have here the old (4.2.2 gcc) then the new (4.5.0 gcc) disassembly:
The first step is to fill out a bug report at the GCC project. Let me know the
bug number so I can track it.
Next, it needs to be determined which version caused the biggest problem.
4.2.x? 4.3.x? 4.4.0? Or HEAD/4.5? It could just get progressively worse with
each version, or perhaps there is some big jump in code size.
- [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Sean D'Epagnier, 2009/05/06
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Steven Michalske, 2009/05/06
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, David Kelly, 2009/05/06
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Sean D'Epagnier, 2009/05/07
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Schwichtenberg, Knut, 2009/05/07
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Kang Tin LAI, 2009/05/07
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Bob Paddock, 2009/05/08
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Weddington, Eric, 2009/05/08
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Rolf Ebert, 2009/05/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] regression in size from 4.2.2 to 4.5.0, Bob Paddock, 2009/05/09