[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX] First try at the Biber support merge

From: Ken Brown
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] First try at the Biber support merge
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:33:48 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1

On 7/25/2012 3:23 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Ken Brown<address@hidden>  writes:

Looking at the patch, the only function in that procedure that was
touched is `TeX-command-query', but to me it looks unlikely to be the

I agree that the changes to TeX-command-query look harmless.  But
TeX-command-query calls TeX-check-files, and Philip made quite a few
changes to the latter.  Could the problem be in that function?

I don't think so.  It seems to be used only to figure out the next TeX
command that would make sense.  If the user selects View explicitly,
that shouldn't have an effect.


BTW, it seems surprising that Philip rewrote TeX-check-files, unless he thought there was a bug in it. I don't see anything specific to Biber or BibTeX either in the original version or in his rewrite. (That explains why you didn't include it in your version of the biber-merge patch.)

Philip, am I missing something?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]