www/licenses gpl-faq.html

[Ineiev]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Ineiev <ineiev> 18/03/13 04:13:08

Modified files:
        licenses       : gpl-faq.html 

Log message:
        Use local references.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/gpl-faq.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.238&r2=1.239

Patches:
Index: gpl-faq.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/gpl-faq.html,v
retrieving revision 1.238
retrieving revision 1.239
diff -u -b -r1.238 -r1.239
--- gpl-faq.html        9 Mar 2018 10:21:10 -0000       1.238
+++ gpl-faq.html        13 Mar 2018 08:13:08 -0000      1.239
@@ -2000,7 +2000,7 @@
  <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#AggregateContainers"
  >#AggregateContainers</a>)</span></dt>
 <dd><p>No, the analysis of whether they are a <a
-href="/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation">single work or an
+href="#MereAggregation">single work or an
 aggregate</a> is unchanged by the involvement of containers.</p></dd>
 
 <dt id="AssignCopyright">Why does
@@ -2411,7 +2411,7 @@
 case of that. Therefore, the company does not have to release the
 modified sources. The situation is different when the modified program
 is licensed under the terms of the <a
-href="/licenses/gpl-faq.html#UnreleasedModsAGPL">GNU Affero GPL</a>.</p>
+href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL">GNU Affero GPL</a>.</p>
 
 <p>Compare this to a situation where the web site contains or links to
 separate GPL'ed programs that are distributed to the user when they
@@ -3933,7 +3933,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2018/03/09 10:21:10 $
+$Date: 2018/03/13 08:13:08 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>