[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/licenses gpl-faq.html
From: |
Therese Godefroy |
Subject: |
www/licenses gpl-faq.html |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Mar 2018 16:25:49 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /webcvs/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Therese Godefroy <th_g> 18/03/08 16:25:49
Modified files:
licenses : gpl-faq.html
Log message:
Modify #UnreleasedMods, add #UnreleasedModsAGPL and
#AggregateContainers (RT #1279607).
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/gpl-faq.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.236&r2=1.237
Patches:
Index: gpl-faq.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/licenses/gpl-faq.html,v
retrieving revision 1.236
retrieving revision 1.237
diff -u -b -r1.236 -r1.237
--- gpl-faq.html 1 Jan 2018 06:21:56 -0000 1.236
+++ gpl-faq.html 8 Mar 2018 21:25:48 -0000 1.237
@@ -181,6 +181,10 @@
“aggregate” and other kinds of “modified
versions”?</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#AggregateContainers">When it comes to determining
+ whether two pieces of software form a single work, does the fact
+ that the code is in one or more containers have any effect?</a></li>
+
<li><a href="#AssignCopyright">Why does the FSF require that
contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign copyright to the
FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, should I do this,
@@ -414,6 +418,11 @@
version of a GPL'ed program on a web site. Does the GPL say they
must release their modified sources?</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL">A company is running a modified
+ version of a program licensed under the GNU Affero GPL (AGPL) on a
+ web site. Does the AGPL say they must release their modified
+ sources?</a></li>
+
<li><a href="#InternalDistribution">Is use within one organization
or company “distribution”?</a></li>
@@ -1985,6 +1994,14 @@
could be a basis to consider the two parts as combined into a larger
program.</p></dd>
+<dt id="AggregateContainers">When it comes to determining
+ whether two pieces of software form a single work, does the fact
+ that the code is in one or more containers have any effect?
+ <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#AggregateContainers"
+ >#AggregateContainers</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd><p>No, the analysis of whether they are a <a
+href="/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#MereAggregation">single work or an
+aggregate</a> is unchanged by the involvement of containers.</p></dd>
<dt id="AssignCopyright">Why does
the FSF require that contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign
@@ -2390,19 +2407,31 @@
>#UnreleasedMods</a>)</span></dt>
<dd><p>
The GPL permits anyone to make a modified version and use it without
-ever distributing it to others. What this company is doing is a
-special case of that. Therefore, the company does not have to release
-the modified sources.</p>
-
-<p>It is essential for people to have the freedom to make modifications and
-use them privately, without ever publishing those modifications. However,
-putting the program on a server machine for the public to talk to is hardly
-“private” use, so it would be legitimate to require release of
-the source code in that special case. Developers who wish to address this
-might want to use the
-<a href="/licenses/agpl.html">GNU Affero GPL</a> for programs
-designed for network server use.</p></dd>
-
+ever distributing it to others. What this company is doing is a special
+case of that. Therefore, the company does not have to release the
+modified sources. The situation is different when the modified program
+is licensed under the terms of the <a
+href="/licenses/gpl-faq.html#UnreleasedModsAGPL">GNU Affero GPL</a>.</p>
+
+<p>Compare this to a situation where the web site contains or links to
+separate GPL'ed programs that are distributed to the user when they
+visit the web site (often written in <a
+href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html">JavaScript</a>, but other
+languages are used as well). In this situation the source code for the
+programs being distributed must be released to the user under the
+terms of the GPL.</p></dd>
+
+<dt id="UnreleasedModsAGPL">A company is running a modified
+ version of a program licensed under the GNU Affero GPL (AGPL) on a
+ web site. Does the AGPL say they must release their modified
+ sources?
+ <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL"
+ >#UnreleasedModsAGPL</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd><p>The <a href="/licenses/agpl.html">GNU Affero GPL</a>
+requires that modified versions of the software offer all users
+interacting with it over a computer network an opportunity to receive
+the source. What the company is doing falls under that meaning, so the
+company must release the modified source code.</p></dd>
<dt id="InternalDistribution">Is making and using multiple copies
within one organization or company “distribution”?
@@ -3904,7 +3933,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2018/01/01 06:21:56 $
+$Date: 2018/03/08 21:25:48 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
- www/licenses gpl-faq.html,
Therese Godefroy <=