www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....

www-commits
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....

From:	Besnik Bleta
Subject:	www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....
Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:42:54 +0000
CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Besnik Bleta <beso>     12/12/18 12:42:54

Modified files:
        philosophy/po  : open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po 

Log message:
        fixing duplicate messages

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8

Patches:
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po  18 Dec 2012 11:43:07 -0000      1.7
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po  18 Dec 2012 12:42:53 -0000      1.8
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
 "POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-12-18 13:34+0200\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-12-18 14:44+0200\n"
 "Last-Translator: Besnik Bleta <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language: \n"
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid "These freedoms are vitally important.  They are essential, not just for 
the individual users' sake, but for society as a whole because they promote 
social solidarity&mdash;that is, sharing and cooperation.  They become even 
more important as our culture and life activities are increasingly digitized.  
In a world of digital sounds, images, and words, free software becomes 
increasingly essential for freedom in general."
-msgstr "KÃ«to liri janÃ« jetike.  Ato janÃ« thelbÃ«sore, jo thjesht pÃ«r hir 
tÃ« pÃ«rdoruesit individual, por pÃ«r hir tÃ« shoqÃ«risÃ« si e tÃ«rÃ«, pasi 
promovuojnÃ« solidaritetin shoqÃ«ror&mdash;pra, ndarjen e gjÃ«rave me tÃ« 
tjerÃ«t dhe bashkÃ«punimin.  Edhe mÃ« tÃ« rÃ«ndÃ«sishme bÃ«hen teksa kultura 
dhe veprimtaritÃ« tona tÃ« pÃ«rditshme sa vjen e bÃ«hen mÃ« dixhitale.  NÃ« 
njÃ« botÃ« tingujsh, figurash, dhe fjalÃ«sh dixhitale, software-i i lirÃ« sa 
vjen e bÃ«het mÃ« thelbÃ«sor pÃ«r lirinÃ« nÃ« pÃ«rgjithÃ«si."
+msgstr "KÃ«to liri janÃ« jetike.  Ato janÃ« thelbÃ«sore, jo thjesht pÃ«r hir 
tÃ« pÃ«rdoruesit individual, por pÃ«r hir tÃ« shoqÃ«risÃ« si e tÃ«rÃ«, pasi 
promovuojnÃ« solidaritetin shoqÃ«ror&mdash;pra, ndarjen e gjÃ«rave me tÃ« 
tjerÃ«t dhe bashkÃ«punimin.  Edhe mÃ« tÃ« rÃ«ndÃ«sishme bÃ«hen teksa kultura 
dhe veprimtaritÃ« tona tÃ« pÃ«rditshme sa vijnÃ« e bÃ«hen mÃ« dixhitale.  NÃ« 
njÃ« botÃ« tingujsh, figurash, dhe fjalÃ«sh dixhitale, software-i i lirÃ« sa 
vjen e bÃ«het mÃ« thelbÃ«sor pÃ«r lirinÃ« nÃ« pÃ«rgjithÃ«si."
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid "Tens of millions of people around the world now use free software; the 
public schools of some regions of India and Spain now teach all students to use 
the free <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux operating system</a>.  
Most of these users, however, have never heard of the ethical reasons for which 
we developed this system and built the free software community, because 
nowadays this system and community are more often spoken of as &ldquo;open 
source&rdquo;, attributing them to a different philosophy in which these 
freedoms are hardly mentioned."
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a 
&ldquo;marketing campaign for free software,&rdquo; which would appeal to 
business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, while 
not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to hear.  Other 
supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's ethical and social 
values.  Whichever their views, when campaigning for open source, they neither 
cited nor advocated those values.  The term &ldquo;open source&rdquo; quickly 
became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, such 
as making or having powerful, reliable software.  Most of the supporters of 
open source have come to it since then, and they make the same association."
-msgstr "Disa nga pÃ«rkrahÃ«sit e burimit tÃ« hapur e konsideronin termin si 
njÃ« &ldquo;fushatÃ« marketingu pÃ«r software-in e lirÃ«,&rdquo; Ã§ka do tÃ« 
joshte drejtues biznesesh pÃ«rmes nxjerrjes nÃ« pah tÃ« pÃ«rfitimeve praktike, 
pa ngritur ndÃ«rkohÃ« Ã§Ã«shtje tÃ« sÃ« mirÃ«s dhe tÃ« gabuarÃ«s pÃ«r tÃ« cilat 
ata nuk do tÃ« donin t'ia dinin.  TÃ« tjerÃ« pÃ«rkrahÃ«s i hodhÃ«n 
kategorikisht poshtÃ« vlerat etike dhe sociale tÃ« lÃ«vizjes sÃ« software-it 
tÃ« lirÃ«.  Cilatdo qofshin pikÃ«pamjet e tyre, kur trajtonin burimin e hapur, 
asnjÃ« prej palÃ«ve as i pÃ«rmendin as mbronin kÃ«to vlera.  Termi &ldquo;burim 
i hapur&rdquo; shpejt filloi tÃ« pÃ«rshoqÃ«rohej me ide dhe argumente tÃ« 
bazuar vetÃ«m nÃ« vlera praktike, tÃ« tilla si krijimi ose pasja e software-eve 
tÃ« fuqishÃ«m, tÃ« qÃ«ndrueshÃ«m.  Prej asokohe shumica e pÃ«rkrahÃ«sve tÃ« 
burimit tÃ« hapur janÃ« rreshtuar pas tij, dhe bÃ«jnÃ« tÃ« njÃ«jtin 
pÃ«rshoqÃ«rim."
+msgstr "Disa nga pÃ«rkrahÃ«sit e burimit tÃ« hapur e konsideronin termin si 
njÃ« &ldquo;fushatÃ« marketingu pÃ«r software-in e lirÃ«,&rdquo; Ã§ka do tÃ« 
joshte drejtues biznesesh pÃ«rmes nxjerrjes nÃ« pah tÃ« pÃ«rfitimeve praktike, 
pa ngritur ndÃ«rkohÃ« Ã§Ã«shtje tÃ« sÃ« mirÃ«s dhe tÃ« gabuarÃ«s pÃ«r tÃ« cilat 
ata nuk do tÃ« donin t'ia dinin.  TÃ« tjerÃ« pÃ«rkrahÃ«s i hodhÃ«n 
kategorikisht poshtÃ« vlerat etike dhe sociale tÃ« lÃ«vizjes sÃ« software-it 
tÃ« lirÃ«.  Cilatdo qofshin pikÃ«pamjet e tyre, kur trajtonin burimin e hapur, 
asnjÃ« prej palÃ«ve as i pÃ«rmendin as mbronin kÃ«to vlera.  Termi &ldquo;burim 
i hapur&rdquo; shpejt filloi tÃ« pÃ«rshoqÃ«rohej me ide dhe argumente tÃ« 
bazuar vetÃ«m nÃ« vlera praktike, tÃ« tilla si krijimi ose pasja e software-eve 
tÃ« fuqishÃ«m, tÃ« qÃ«ndrueshÃ«m.  Prej asokohe, shumica e pÃ«rkrahÃ«sve tÃ« 
burimit tÃ« hapur janÃ« rreshtuar pas tij, dhe bÃ«jnÃ« tÃ« njÃ«jtin 
pÃ«rshoqÃ«rim."
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid "Nearly all open source software is free software.  The two terms 
describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based 
on fundamentally different values.  Open source is a development methodology; 
free software is a social movement.  For the free software movement, free 
software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the 
users' freedom.  By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues in 
terms of how to make software &ldquo;better&rdquo;&mdash;in a practical sense 
only.  It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical 
problem at hand.  For the free software movement, however, nonfree software is 
a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free 
software."
@@ -63,41 +63,6 @@
 msgid "We in the free software movement don't think of the open source camp as 
an enemy; the enemy is proprietary (nonfree) software.  But we want people to 
know we stand for freedom, so we do not accept being mislabeled as open source 
supporters."
 msgstr "Ne tÃ« lÃ«vizjes sÃ« software-it tÃ« lirÃ« nuk e shohim kampin e 
burimit tÃ« hapur si njÃ« armik; armiku Ã«shtÃ« software-i pronÃ«sor (jo i 
lirÃ«) .  Por duam qÃ« njerÃ«zit ta dinÃ« se ne jemi pÃ«r lirinÃ«, ndaj nuk e 
pranojmÃ« tÃ« etiketohemi gabimisht si pÃ«rkrahÃ«s tÃ« burimit tÃ« hapur."
 
-msgid "When we call software &ldquo;free,&rdquo; we mean that it respects the 
<a href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">users' essential freedoms</a>: the freedom 
to run it, to study and change it, and to redistribute copies with or without 
changes.  This is a matter of freedom, not price, so think of &ldquo;free 
speech,&rdquo; not &ldquo;free beer.&rdquo;"
-msgstr "Kur e quajmÃ« software-in &ldquo;tÃ« lirÃ«,&rdquo; e kemi fjalÃ«n qÃ« 
ai respekton <a href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">liritÃ« thelbÃ«sore tÃ« 
pÃ«rdoruesit</a>: lirinÃ« pÃ«r ta xhiruar, studiuar, dhe rishpÃ«rndarÃ« kopje 
tÃ« tij me ose pa ndryshime.  Kjo Ã«shtÃ« Ã§Ã«shtje lirie, jo Ã§mimi, pra 
mendojeni si tek &ldquo;fjala e lirÃ«,&rdquo; jo si te &ldquo;birrÃ« 
falas.&rdquo;"
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "These freedoms are vitally important.  They are essential, not just for 
the individual users' sake, but for society as a whole because they promote 
social solidarity&mdash;that is, sharing and cooperation.  They become even 
more important as our culture and life activities are increasingly digitized.  
In a world of digital sounds, images, and words, free software becomes 
increasingly essential for freedom in general."
-msgstr "KÃ«to liri janÃ« jetike.  Ato janÃ« thelbÃ«sore, jo thjesht pÃ«r hir 
tÃ« pÃ«rdoruesit individual, por pÃ«r hir tÃ« shoqÃ«risÃ« si e tÃ«rÃ«, pasi 
promovuojnÃ« solidaritetin shoqÃ«ror&mdash;pra, ndarjen e gjÃ«rave me tÃ« 
tjerÃ«t dhe bashkÃ«punimin.  Edhe mÃ« tÃ« rÃ«ndÃ«sishme bÃ«hen teksa kultura 
dhe veprimtaritÃ« tona tÃ« pÃ«rditshme sa vjen e bÃ«hen mÃ« dixhitale.  NÃ« 
njÃ« botÃ« tingujsh, figurash, dhe fjalÃ«sh dixhitale, software-i i lirÃ« sa 
vjen e bÃ«het mÃ« thelbÃ«sor pÃ«r lirinÃ« nÃ« pÃ«rgjithÃ«si."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "Tens of millions of people around the world now use free software; the 
public schools of some regions of India and Spain now teach all students to use 
the free <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">GNU/Linux operating system</a>.  
Most of these users, however, have never heard of the ethical reasons for which 
we developed this system and built the free software community, because 
nowadays this system and community are more often spoken of as &ldquo;open 
source&rdquo;, attributing them to a different philosophy in which these 
freedoms are hardly mentioned."
-msgstr "DhjetÃ«ra miliona njerÃ«z anembanÃ« botÃ«s pÃ«rdorin tani software tÃ« 
lirÃ«; shkollat publike nÃ« disa rajone tÃ« IndisÃ« dhe SpanjÃ«s tani u thonÃ« 
nxÃ«nÃ«sve tÃ« pÃ«rdorin <a href=\"/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html\">sistemin e lirÃ« 
operativ GNU/Linux</a>.  MegjithatÃ«, shumica e kÃ«tyre pÃ«rdoruesve nuk kanÃ« 
dÃ«gjuar kurrÃ« rreth arsyeve etike pÃ«r tÃ« cilat e krijuam kÃ«tÃ« sistem dhe 
ngritÃ«m bashkÃ«sinÃ« e software-it tÃ« lirÃ«, ngaqÃ« sot ky sistem dhe 
bashkÃ«sia mÃ« shpesh shihen si tÃ« &ldquo;burimit tÃ« hapur&rdquo;, duke iu 
atribuar njÃ« tjetÃ«r filozofi, tek e cila kÃ«to liri me zor pÃ«rmenden."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "The free software movement has campaigned for computer users' freedom 
since 1983.  In 1984 we launched the development of the free operating system 
GNU, so that we could avoid the nonfree operating systems that deny freedom to 
their users.  During the 1980s, we developed most of the essential components 
of the system and designed the <a href=\"/licenses/gpl.html\">GNU General 
Public License</a> (GNU GPL) to release them under&mdash;a license designed 
specifically to protect freedom for all users of a program."
-msgstr "LÃ«vizja e software-it tÃ« lirÃ« ka dalÃ« nÃ« mbrojtje tÃ« lirisÃ« sÃ« 
pÃ«rdoruesit qÃ« mÃ« 1983-shin.  MÃ« 1984-n filluam zhvillimin e sistemit 
operativ tÃ« lirÃ« GNU, qÃ« tÃ« mund tÃ« shmangeshin sistemet operativÃ« jo tÃ« 
lirÃ« tÃ« cilÃ«t u mohojnÃ« pÃ«rdoruesve kÃ«to liri.  GjatÃ« viteve '80, 
zhvilluam shumicÃ«n e pÃ«rbÃ«rÃ«sve thelbÃ«sorÃ« tÃ« sistemit dhe hartuam lejen 
<a href=\"/licenses/gpl.html\">GNU General Public License</a> (GNU GPL) nÃ«n 
tÃ« cilÃ«n do tÃ« hidheshin nÃ« qarkullim&mdash;njÃ« leje e hartuar 
posaÃ§Ã«risht pÃ«r mbrojtjen e lirisÃ« pÃ«r tÃ« gjithÃ« pÃ«rdoruesit e njÃ« 
programi."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "Not all of the users and developers of free software agreed with the 
goals of the free software movement.  In 1998, a part of the free software 
community splintered off and began campaigning in the name of &ldquo;open 
source.&rdquo; The term was originally proposed to avoid a possible 
misunderstanding of the term &ldquo;free software,&rdquo; but it soon became 
associated with philosophical views quite different from those of the free 
software movement."
-msgstr "Jo tÃ« gjithÃ« pÃ«rdoruesit dhe zhvilluesit e software-it tÃ« lirÃ« u 
pajtuan me synimet e lÃ«vizjes sÃ« software-it tÃ« lirÃ«.  MÃ« 1998-n, njÃ« 
pjesÃ« e bashkÃ«sisÃ« sÃ« software-it tÃ« lirÃ« doli veÃ§ dhe filloi fushatÃ« 
nÃ« emÃ«r tÃ« &ldquo;burimit tÃ« hapur.&rdquo; Termi fillimisht u propozua pÃ«r 
shmangien e njÃ« keqkuptimi tÃ« mundshÃ«m tÃ« termit &ldquo;software i 
lirÃ«,&rdquo; por shpejt filloi t'u pÃ«rshoqÃ«rohej ideve filozofike mjaft tÃ« 
ndryshme nga ato tÃ« lÃ«vizjes sÃ« software-it tÃ« lirÃ«."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a 
&ldquo;marketing campaign for free software,&rdquo; which would appeal to 
business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, while 
not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to hear.  Other 
supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's ethical and social 
values.  Whichever their views, when campaigning for open source, they neither 
cited nor advocated those values.  The term &ldquo;open source&rdquo; quickly 
became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, such 
as making or having powerful, reliable software.  Most of the supporters of 
open source have come to it since then, and they make the same association."
-msgstr "Disa nga pÃ«rkrahÃ«sit e burimit tÃ« hapur e konsideroni termin si 
njÃ« &ldquo;fushatÃ« marketingu pÃ«r software-in e lirÃ«,&rdquo; Ã§ka do tÃ« 
joshte drejtues biznesesh pÃ«rmes nxjerrjes nÃ« pah tÃ« pÃ«rfitimeve praktike, 
pa ngritur ndÃ«rkohÃ« Ã§Ã«shtje tÃ« sÃ« mirÃ«s dhe tÃ« gabuarÃ«s pÃ«r tÃ« cilat 
ata nuk do tÃ« donin t'ia dinin.  TÃ« tjerÃ« pÃ«rkrahÃ«s i hodhÃ«n 
kategorikisht poshtÃ« vlerat etike dhe sociale tÃ« lÃ«vizjes sÃ« software-it 
tÃ« lirÃ«.  Cilatdo qofshin pikÃ«pamjet e tyre, kur trajtonin burimin e hapur, 
asnjÃ« prej palÃ«ve as i pÃ«rmendin as mbronin kÃ«to vlera.  Termi &ldquo;burim 
i hapur&rdquo; shpejt filloi tÃ« pÃ«rshoqÃ«rohej me ide dhe argumenta tÃ« 
bazuar vetÃ«m nÃ« vlera praktike, tÃ« tilla si krijimi ose pasja e software-eve 
tÃ« fuqishÃ«m, tÃ« qÃ«ndrueshÃ«m.  Prej asokohe shumica e pÃ«rkrahÃ«sve tÃ« 
burimit tÃ« hapur janÃ« rreshtuar pas tij, dhe bÃ«jnÃ« tÃ« njÃ«jtin 
pÃ«rshoqÃ«rim."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "Nearly all open source software is free software.  The two terms 
describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based 
on fundamentally different values.  Open source is a development methodology; 
free software is a social movement.  For the free software movement, free 
software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the 
users' freedom.  By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues in 
terms of how to make software &ldquo;better&rdquo;&mdash;in a practical sense 
only.  It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical 
problem at hand.  For the free software movement, however, nonfree software is 
a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free 
software."
-msgstr "Thuajse krejt software-i me burim tÃ« hapur Ã«shtÃ« software i lirÃ«.  
Dy termat pÃ«rshkruajnÃ« pothuajse tÃ« njÃ«jtÃ«n kategori software-i, por 
mbrojnÃ« pikÃ«pamje tÃ« bazuara thelbÃ«sisht mbi vlera tÃ« ndryshme.  Burimi i 
hapur Ã«shtÃ« njÃ« metodologji programimi; software-i i lirÃ« Ã«shtÃ« njÃ« 
lÃ«vizje shoqÃ«rore.  PÃ«r lÃ«vizjen e software-it tÃ« lirÃ«, software-i lirÃ« 
Ã«shtÃ« njÃ« imperativ etik, pasi vetÃ«m software-i i lirÃ« respekton lirinÃ« e 
pÃ«rdoruesve.  NÃ« kontrast me tÃ«, filozofia e burimit tÃ« hapur i sheh 
Ã§Ã«shtjet sipas optikÃ«s se si tÃ« bÃ«het software-i &ldquo;mÃ« i 
mirÃ«&rdquo;&mdash;vetÃ«m nga pikÃ«pamja praktike.  Sipas saj, software-et jo 
tÃ« lira janÃ« njÃ« zgjidhje inferiore pÃ«r njÃ« problem praktik tÃ« dhÃ«nÃ«.  
PÃ«r lÃ«vizjen e software-it tÃ« lirÃ«, ama, software-i jo i lirÃ« Ã«shtÃ« njÃ« 
problem shoqÃ«ror, dhe zgjidhja Ã«shtÃ« tÃ« reshtet pÃ«rdorimi i tij dhe tÃ« 
kalohet te software-i i lirÃ«."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "&ldquo;Free software.&rdquo; &ldquo;Open source.&rdquo; If it's the 
same software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words 
convey different ideas.  While a free program by any other name would give you 
the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends above all 
on teaching people to value freedom.  If you want to help do this, it is 
essential to speak of &ldquo;free software.&rdquo;"
-msgstr "&ldquo;Software i lirÃ«.&rdquo; &ldquo;Burim i hapur.&rdquo; NÃ«se 
bÃ«het fjalÃ« pÃ«r tÃ« njÃ«jtin program, ka rÃ«ndÃ«si cilin emÃ«r pÃ«rdorni? 
Po, ngaqÃ« fjalÃ« tÃ« ndryshme pÃ«rcjellin ide tÃ« ndryshme.  Edhe pse njÃ« 
program i lirÃ«, me Ã§farÃ«do emri tjetÃ«r, sot ju jep tÃ« njÃ«jtÃ«n liri, 
forcimi i pozitave tÃ« lirisÃ« nÃ« njÃ« rrugÃ« tÃ« qÃ«ndrueshme varet mbi tÃ« 
gjitha nga tÃ« mÃ«suarit e njerÃ«zve tÃ« Ã§mojnÃ« lirinÃ«.  NÃ«se doni tÃ« 
ndihmoni pÃ«r kÃ«tÃ«, Ã«shtÃ« thelbÃ«sore tÃ« flitet pÃ«r &ldquo;software tÃ« 
lirÃ«.&rdquo;"
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "We in the free software movement don't think of the open source camp as 
an enemy; the enemy is proprietary (nonfree) software.  But we want people to 
know we stand for freedom, so we do not accept being mislabeled as open source 
supporters."
-msgstr "Ne tÃ« lÃ«vizjes sÃ« software-it tÃ« lirÃ« nuk e shohim kampin e 
burimit tÃ« hapur si njÃ« armik; armiku Ã«shtÃ« software-i pronÃ«sor (jo i 
lirÃ«) .  Por duam qÃ« njerÃ«zit ta dinÃ« se ne jemi pÃ«r lirinÃ«, ndaj nuk e 
pranojmÃ« tÃ« etiketohemi gabimisht si pÃ«rkrahÃ«s tÃ« burimit tÃ« hapur."
-
 #. type: Content of: <h3>
 msgid "Common Misunderstandings of &ldquo;Free Software&rdquo; and &ldquo;Open 
Source&rdquo;"
 msgstr "Moskuptime tÃ« RÃ«ndomta tÃ« &ldquo;Software-it tÃ« LirÃ«&rdquo; dhe 
&ldquo;Burimit tÃ« Hapur&rdquo;"
@@ -126,7 +91,7 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid "The <i>New York Times</i> has <a 
href=\"http://www.nytimes.com/external/gigaom/2009/02/07/07gigaom-the-brave-new-world-of-open-source-game-design-37415.html\";>
 run an article that stretches the meaning of the term</a> to refer to user 
beta testing&mdash;letting a few users try an early version and give 
confidential feedback&mdash;which proprietary software developers have 
practiced for decades."
-msgstr "<i>New York Times</i> pati njÃ« <a 
href=\"http://www.nytimes.com/external/gigaom/2009/02/07/07gigaom-the-brave-new-world-of-open-source-game-design-37415.html\";>
 artikull qÃ« e tepron me domethÃ«nien e termit</a> duke ia referuar testimeve 
beta nga ana e pÃ«rdoruesve&mdash;lejimi i pak pÃ«rdoruesve tÃ« vÃ«nÃ« nÃ« 
provÃ« njÃ« version paraprak tÃ« njÃ« programi dhe tÃ« japin pÃ«rshtypje 
konfidenciale lidhur me tÃ«&mdash;Ã§ka programuesit e software-eve pronÃ«sore e 
kanÃ« praktikuar prej dhjetÃ«ra vjetÃ«sh."
+msgstr "<i>New York Times</i> pati njÃ« <a 
href=\"http://www.nytimes.com/external/gigaom/2009/02/07/07gigaom-the-brave-new-world-of-open-source-game-design-37415.html\";>
 artikull qÃ« e tepron me domethÃ«nien e termit</a> duke ia referuar testimeve 
beta nga ana e pÃ«rdoruesve&mdash;lejimi i pak pÃ«rdoruesve qÃ« tÃ« vÃ«nÃ« nÃ« 
provÃ« njÃ« version paraprak tÃ« njÃ« programi dhe tÃ« japin pÃ«rshtypje 
konfidenciale lidhur me tÃ«&mdash;Ã§ka programuesit e software-eve pronÃ«sore e 
kanÃ« praktikuar prej dhjetÃ«ra vjetÃ«sh."
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid "Open source supporters try to deal with this by pointing to their 
official definition, but that corrective approach is less effective for them 
than it is for us.  The term &ldquo;free software&rdquo; has two natural 
meanings, one of which is the intended meaning, so a person who has grasped the 
idea of &ldquo;free speech, not free beer&rdquo; will not get it wrong again.  
But the term &ldquo;open source&rdquo; has only one natural meaning, which is 
different from the meaning its supporters intend.  So there is no succinct way 
to explain and justify its official definition.  That makes for worse 
confusion."
@@ -140,47 +105,6 @@
 msgid "The term &ldquo;open source&rdquo; has been further stretched by its 
application to other activities, such as government, education, and science, 
where there is no such thing as source code, and where criteria for software 
licensing are simply not pertinent.  The only thing these activities have in 
common is that they somehow invite people to participate.  They stretch the 
term so far that it only means &ldquo;participatory&rdquo;."
 msgstr "Termi &ldquo;burim i hapur&rdquo; Ã«shtÃ« sforcuar mÃ« tej nga zbatimi 
i tij mbi veprimtari tÃ« tjera, tÃ« tilla si qeverisja, arsimi, shkenca, te tÃ« 
cilat nuk ka gjÃ« tÃ« tillÃ« si kodi burim, dhe ku kriteri lidhur me licencimin 
e software-eve thjesht nuk ka punÃ« fare.  E vetmja gjÃ« e pÃ«rbashkÃ«t qÃ« 
kanÃ« kÃ«to veprimtari Ã«shtÃ« se, nÃ« njÃ« farÃ« mÃ«nyre, i ftojnÃ« njerÃ«zit 
tÃ« marrin pjesÃ« nÃ« diÃ§ka.  Ato e sforcojnÃ« termin deri atje sa me tÃ« 
nÃ«nkuptohet vetÃ«m  &ldquo;pjesÃ«marrÃ«s&rdquo;."
 
-msgid "Common Misunderstandings of &ldquo;Free Software&rdquo; and &ldquo;Open 
Source&rdquo;"
-msgstr "Moskuptime tÃ« RÃ«ndomta tÃ« &ldquo;Software-it tÃ« LirÃ«&rdquo; dhe 
&ldquo;Burimit tÃ« Hapur&rdquo;"
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "The term &ldquo;free software&rdquo; is prone to misinterpretation: an 
unintended meaning, &ldquo;software you can get for zero price,&rdquo; fits the 
term just as well as the intended meaning, &ldquo;software which gives the user 
certain freedoms.&rdquo; We address this problem by publishing the definition 
of free software, and by saying &ldquo;Think of &lsquo;free speech,&rsquo; not 
&lsquo;free beer.&rsquo;&rdquo; This is not a perfect solution; it cannot 
completely eliminate the problem.  An unambiguous and correct term would be 
better, if it didn't present other problems."
-msgstr "Termi &ldquo;software i lirÃ«&rdquo; Ã«shtÃ« i hapur ndaj 
keqinterpretimeve: njÃ« kuptim i pasynuar prej nesh, &ldquo;software qÃ« mund 
ta keni me Ã§mim zero,&rdquo; mund t'i jepet termit po njÃ«soj si kuptimi i 
synuar prej nesh, &ldquo;software qÃ« i jep pÃ«rdoruesit disa liri.&rdquo; PÃ«r 
kÃ«tÃ« problem kujdesemi duke bÃ«rÃ« publik pÃ«rkufizimin e software-it tÃ« 
lirÃ«, dhe duke thÃ«nÃ« &ldquo;Mendojeni si te &lsquo;liria e fjalÃ«s,&rsquo; 
jo si te &lsquo;birrÃ« falas.&rsquo;&rdquo; Kjo nuk Ã«shtÃ« zgjidhje e 
pÃ«rsosur; nuk mund ta eliminojÃ« plotÃ«sisht problemin.  Do tÃ« ishte mÃ« 
mirÃ« njÃ« term i saktÃ« dhe jo i dykuptimtÃ«, sikur kjo tÃ« mos paraqiste 
probleme tÃ« tjera."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "Unfortunately, all the alternatives in English have problems of their 
own.  We've looked at many that people have suggested, but none is so clearly 
&ldquo;right&rdquo; that switching to it would be a good idea.  (For instance, 
in some contexts the French and Spanish word &ldquo;libre&rdquo; works well, 
but people in India do not recognize it at all.)  Every proposed replacement 
for &ldquo;free software&rdquo; has some kind of semantic problem&mdash;and 
this includes &ldquo;open source software.&rdquo;"
-msgstr "Mjerisht, tÃ« gjitha alternativat nÃ« Anglisht kanÃ« probleme tÃ« 
tyret.  Kemi shqyrtuar mjaft nga sugjerimet e njerÃ«zve, por asnjÃ« nuk Ã«shtÃ« 
kaq qartazi &ldquo;i drejtÃ«&rdquo; saqÃ« kalimi nÃ« tÃ« tÃ« qe ide e mirÃ«.  
(PÃ«r shembull, nÃ« disa kontekste fjalÃ«t FrÃ«ngjisht dhe Spanjisht 
&ldquo;libre&rdquo; funksionojnÃ« bukur, por njerÃ«zit nÃ« Indi nuk e pranojnÃ« 
fare kÃ«tÃ«.)  Cilido zÃ«vendÃ«sim i propozuar pÃ«r &ldquo;software-in e 
lirÃ«&rdquo; ka ndonjÃ« lloj problemi semantik&mdash;dhe kjo pÃ«rfshin edhe 
&ldquo;software-in me burim tÃ« hapur.&rdquo;"
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "The <a href=\"http://opensource.org/docs/osd\";>official definition of 
&ldquo;open source software&rdquo;</a> (which is published by the Open Source 
Initiative and is too long to include here) was derived indirectly from our 
criteria for free software.  It is not the same; it is a little looser in some 
respects, so the open source people have accepted a few licenses that we 
consider unacceptably restrictive.  Also, they judge solely by the license of 
the source code, whereas our criterion also considers whether a device will let 
you <em>run</em> your modified version of the program.  Nonetheless, their 
definition agrees with our definition in most cases."
-msgstr "<a href=\"http://opensource.org/docs/osd\";>PÃ«rkufizimi zyrtar i 
&ldquo;software-it me burim tÃ« hapur&rdquo;</a> (qÃ« Ã«shtÃ« botuar nga Open 
Source Initiative dhe Ã«shtÃ« shumÃ« i gjatÃ« pÃ«r ta pÃ«rfshirÃ« kÃ«tu) 
Ã«shtÃ« derivuar tÃ«rthorazi prej kriterit tonÃ« tÃ« software-eve tÃ« lira.  
Nuk Ã«shtÃ« i njÃ«jti; Ã«shtÃ« ca mÃ« i lirshÃ«m nÃ« disa kÃ«ndvÃ«shtrime, ndaj 
njerÃ«zit e burimit tÃ« hapur kanÃ« pranuar disa leje qÃ« ne i konsiderojmÃ« 
papranueshmÃ«risht shtrÃ«nguese.  Gjithashtu, ata gjykojnÃ« vetÃ«m mbi bazÃ«n e 
lejes mbi kodin burim, ndÃ«rkohÃ« qÃ« kriteri ynÃ« merr nÃ« konsideratÃ« edhe 
nÃ«se lejoheni apo jo <em>tÃ« xhironi</em> versionin tuaj tÃ« modifikuar tÃ« 
programit.  MegjithatÃ«, pÃ«rkufizimi i tyre pajtohet me pÃ«rkufizimin tonÃ« 
nÃ« shumicÃ«n e rasteve."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "However, the obvious meaning for the expression &ldquo;open source 
software&rdquo;&mdash;and the one most people seem to think it means&mdash;is 
&ldquo;You can look at the source code.&rdquo; That criterion is much weaker 
than the free software definition, much weaker also than the official 
definition of open source.  It includes many programs that are neither free nor 
open source."
-msgstr "Sido qÃ« tÃ« jetÃ«, kuptimi i afÃ«rmendshÃ«m pÃ«r shprehjen 
&ldquo;software me burim tÃ« hapur&rdquo;&mdash;dhe ai qÃ« shumica e njerÃ«zve 
duket se mendojnÃ« qÃ« shpreh&mdash;Ã«shtÃ« &ldquo;Mund t'i shihni kodin 
burim.&rdquo; Ky kriter Ã«shtÃ« shumÃ« mÃ« i dobÃ«t se sa pÃ«rkufizimi i 
software-it tÃ« lirÃ«, shumÃ« mÃ« i dobÃ«t gjithashtu se sa pÃ«rkufizimi zyrtar 
i burimit tÃ« hapur.  Me tÃ« pÃ«rfshihen mjaft programe qÃ« nuk janÃ« as tÃ« 
lirÃ« dhe as me burim tÃ« hapur."
-
-#. It was from http://da.state.ks.us/itec/TechArchPt6ver80.pdf, but
-#. that page is no longer available.
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "Since that obvious meaning for &ldquo;open source&rdquo; is not the 
meaning that its advocates intend, the result is that most people misunderstand 
the term.  According to writer Neal Stephenson, &ldquo;Linux is &lsquo;open 
source&rsquo; software meaning, simply, that anyone can get copies of its 
source code files.&rdquo; I don't think he deliberately sought to reject or 
dispute the &ldquo;official&rdquo; definition.  I think he simply applied the 
conventions of the English language to come up with a meaning for the term.  
The state of Kansas published a similar definition: &ldquo;Make use of 
open-source software (OSS).  OSS is software for which the source code is 
freely and publicly available, though the specific licensing agreements vary as 
to what one is allowed to do with that code.&rdquo;"
-msgstr "NgaqÃ« kuptimi i afÃ«rmendshÃ«m pÃ«r &ldquo;burimin e hapur&rdquo; nuk 
Ã«shtÃ« kuptimi qÃ« mbrojtÃ«sit e tij kanÃ« nÃ« mendje, pÃ«rfundimi Ã«shtÃ« qÃ« 
shumica e njerÃ«zve tÃ« kenÃ« keqkuptime tÃ« termit.  Sipas Neal Stephenson-it, 
&ldquo;Linux-i Ã«shtÃ« software me &lsquo;burim tÃ« hapur&rsquo; qÃ« do tÃ« 
thotÃ«, thjesht, se cilido mund tÃ« ketÃ« kopje tÃ« kartelave tÃ« kodit tÃ« tij 
burim.&rdquo; Nuk mendoj se ka kÃ«rkuar me dashje tÃ« hidhte tej ose tÃ« vinte 
nÃ« diskutim pÃ«rkufizimin &ldquo;zyrtar&rdquo;.  Jam i mendimit qÃ« ai thjesht 
zbatoi konvencionet e Anglishtes pÃ«r tÃ« nxjerrÃ« njÃ« kuptim tÃ« termin.  
Shteti i Kansasit publikoi njÃ« pÃ«rkufizim tÃ« ngjashÃ«m: &ldquo;PÃ«rdorni 
software me burim tÃ« hapur (OSS).  OSS Ã«shtÃ« software pÃ«r tÃ« cilin kodi 
burim Ã«shtÃ« i passhÃ«m lirisht dhe publikisht, por marrÃ«veshjet specifike 
pÃ«r licensimin e tij variojnÃ« lidhur me atÃ« se Ã§'i lejohet dikujt tÃ« 
bÃ«jÃ« me atÃ« kod.&rdquo;"
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "The <i>New York Times</i> has <a 
href=\"http://www.nytimes.com/external/gigaom/2009/02/07/07gigaom-the-brave-new-world-of-open-source-game-design-37415.html\";>
 run an article that stretches the meaning of the term</a> to refer to user 
beta testing&mdash;letting a few users try an early version and give 
confidential feedback&mdash;which proprietary software developers have 
practiced for decades."
-msgstr "<i>New York Times</i> pati njÃ« <a 
href=\"http://www.nytimes.com/external/gigaom/2009/02/07/07gigaom-the-brave-new-world-of-open-source-game-design-37415.html\";>
 artikull qÃ« e tepron me domethÃ«nien e termit</a> duke ia referuar testimeve 
beta nga ana e pÃ«rdoruesve&mdash;lejimi i pak pÃ«rdoruesve tÃ« vÃ«nÃ« nÃ« 
provÃ« njÃ« version paraprak tÃ« njÃ« programi dhe tÃ« japin pÃ«rshtypje 
konfidenciale lidhur me tÃ«&mdash;Ã§ka programuesit e software-eve pronÃ«sore e 
kanÃ« praktikuar prej dhjetÃ«ra vjetÃ«sh."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "Open source supporters try to deal with this by pointing to their 
official definition, but that corrective approach is less effective for them 
than it is for us.  The term &ldquo;free software&rdquo; has two natural 
meanings, one of which is the intended meaning, so a person who has grasped the 
idea of &ldquo;free speech, not free beer&rdquo; will not get it wrong again.  
But the term &ldquo;open source&rdquo; has only one natural meaning, which is 
different from the meaning its supporters intend.  So there is no succinct way 
to explain and justify its official definition.  That makes for worse 
confusion."
-msgstr "PÃ«rkrahÃ«sit e burimit tÃ« hapur pÃ«rpiqen tÃ« merren me kÃ«tÃ« 
Ã§Ã«shtje duke treguar me gisht pÃ«rkufizimin e tyre zyrtar, por kjo rrugÃ« 
ndreqjeje Ã«shtÃ« mÃ« pak e efektshme pÃ«r ta se sa Ã«shtÃ« pÃ«r ne.  Termi 
&ldquo;software i lirÃ«&rdquo; ka dy domethÃ«nie natyrale, njÃ«ra Ã«shtÃ« 
domethÃ«nia e synuar, ndaj dikush qÃ« e ka rrokur idenÃ« &ldquo;si te fjala e 
lirÃ«, jo si te birrÃ« falas&rdquo; nuk do tÃ« gabojÃ« sÃ«rish.  Por termi 
&ldquo;burim i hapur&rdquo; ka vetÃ«m njÃ« domethÃ«nie natyrale, qÃ« Ã«shtÃ« e 
ndryshme prej domethÃ«nies sÃ« synuar prej pÃ«rkrahÃ«sve tÃ« tij.  Pra nuk ka 
njÃ« rrugÃ« pÃ«r tÃ« shpjeguar shkurtimisht dhe pÃ«rligjur pÃ«rkufizimin e tij 
zyrtar.  Kjo e pÃ«rkeqÃ«son edhe mÃ« konfuzionin."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "Another misunderstanding of &ldquo;open source&rdquo; is the idea that 
it means &ldquo;not using the GNU GPL.&rdquo; This tends to accompany another 
misunderstanding that &ldquo;free software&rdquo; means &ldquo;GPL-covered 
software.&rdquo; These are both mistaken, since the GNU GPL qualifies as an 
open source license and most of the open source licenses qualify as free 
software licenses."
-msgstr "NjÃ« tjetÃ«r keqkuptim i &ldquo;burimit tÃ« hapur&rdquo; Ã«shtÃ« ideja 
qÃ« me tÃ« nÃ«nkuptohet &ldquo;mospÃ«rdorimi i lejes GNU GPL.&rdquo; Ky priret 
tÃ« shoqÃ«rojÃ« njÃ« tjetÃ«r keqkuptim sipas tÃ« cilit &ldquo;software-i i 
lirÃ«&rdquo; do tÃ« thotÃ« &ldquo;software nÃ«n GPL-nÃ«.&rdquo; QÃ« tÃ« dyja 
janÃ« gabim, sa kohÃ« qÃ« GNU GPL-ja i plotÃ«son kushtet pÃ«r tÃ« qenÃ« leje 
burimi tÃ« hapur dhe shumica e lejeve tÃ« burimit tÃ« hapur i plotÃ«sojnÃ« 
kushtet pÃ«r tÃ« qenÃ« leje software-i tÃ« lirÃ«."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "The term &ldquo;open source&rdquo; has been further stretched by its 
application to other activities, such as government, education, and science, 
where there is no such thing as source code, and where criteria for software 
licensing are simply not pertinent.  The only thing these activities have in 
common is that they somehow invite people to participate.  They stretch the 
term so far that it only means &ldquo;participatory&rdquo;."
-msgstr "Termi &ldquo;burim i hapur&rdquo; Ã«shtÃ« sforcuar mÃ« tej nga zbatimi 
i tij mbi veprimtari tÃ« tjera, tÃ« tilla si qeverisja, arsimi, shkenca, te tÃ« 
cilat nuk ka gjÃ« tÃ« tillÃ« si kodi burim, dhe ku kriteri lidhur me licencimin 
e software-eve thjesht nuk ka punÃ« fare.  E vetmja gjÃ« qÃ« kÃ«to veprimtari 
kanÃ« tÃ« pÃ«rbashkÃ«t Ã«shtÃ« qÃ« nÃ« njÃ« farÃ« mÃ«nyre i ftojnÃ« njerÃ«zit 
tÃ« marrin pjesÃ« nÃ« diÃ§ka.  Ato e sforcojnÃ« termin deri atje sa me tÃ« 
nÃ«nkuptohet vetÃ«m  &ldquo;pjesÃ«marrÃ«s&rdquo;."
-
 #. type: Content of: <h3>
 msgid "Different Values Can Lead to Similar Conclusions&hellip;but Not Always"
 msgstr "Vlera tÃ« Ndryshme Mund tÃ« Shpien NÃ« PÃ«rfundime tÃ« 
Ngjashme&hellip;Por Jo GjithmonÃ«"
@@ -233,25 +157,6 @@
 msgid "This software might be open source and use the open source development 
model, but it won't be free software since it won't respect the freedom of the 
users that actually run it.  If the open source development model succeeds in 
making this software more powerful and reliable for restricting you, that will 
make it even worse."
 msgstr "Ky software mund tÃ« jetÃ« me burim tÃ« hapur dhe tÃ« pÃ«rdorÃ« 
modelin e zhvillimit me burim tÃ« hapur, por nuk ka pÃ«r tÃ« qenÃ« software i 
lirÃ«, sa kohÃ« qÃ« nuk do tÃ« respektojÃ« lirinÃ« e pÃ«rdoruesve qÃ« e 
xhirojnÃ« faktikisht atÃ«. NÃ«se modeli i zhvillimit me burim tÃ« hapur ia del 
ta bÃ«jÃ« kÃ«tÃ« software mÃ« tÃ« fuqishÃ«m dhe mÃ« tÃ« qÃ«ndrueshÃ«m pÃ«r 
kufizimin tuaj, kjo do ta bÃ«nte edhe mÃ« tÃ« keq."
 
-msgid "The idea that we want software to be powerful and reliable comes from 
the supposition that the software is designed to serve its users.  If it is 
powerful and reliable, that means it serves them better."
-msgstr "Ideja se duam qÃ« software-i tÃ« jetÃ« i fuqishÃ«m dhe i qÃ«ndrueshÃ«m 
vjen prej supozimit se software-i Ã«shtÃ« hartuar pÃ«r t'u shÃ«rbyes 
pÃ«rdoruesve tÃ« tyre.  NÃ«se Ã«shtÃ« i fuqishÃ«m dhe i qÃ«ndrueshÃ«m, kjo do 
tÃ« thotÃ« qÃ« u shÃ«rben mÃ« mirÃ« atyre."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "But software can be said to serve its users only if it respects their 
freedom.  What if the software is designed to put chains on its users? Then 
powerfulness means the chains are more constricting, and reliability that they 
are harder to remove.  Malicious features, such as spying on the users, 
restricting the users, back doors, and imposed upgrades are common in 
proprietary software, and some open source supporters want to implement them in 
open source programs."
-msgstr "Por mund tÃ« thuhet qÃ« software-i u shÃ«rben pÃ«rdoruesve  vetÃ«m 
nÃ«se respekton lirinÃ« e tyre.  Po kur software-i Ã«shtÃ« hartuar pÃ«r t'u 
hedhur vargonj pÃ«rdoruesve tÃ« tij? NÃ« kÃ«tÃ« rast tÃ« qenÃ«t i fuqishÃ«m do 
tÃ« thotÃ« qÃ« vargonjtÃ« janÃ« mÃ« shtrÃ«ngues, dhe tÃ« qenÃ«t i qÃ«ndrueshÃ«m 
do tÃ« thotÃ« qÃ« Ã«shtÃ« mÃ« e vÃ«shtirÃ« pÃ«r t'i hequr kÃ«ta vargonj.  
VeÃ§ori keqdashÃ«se, tÃ« tilla si spiunimi i pÃ«rdoruesve, kufizimi i 
pÃ«rdoruesve, dyer tÃ« pasme, dhe pÃ«rmirÃ«sime tÃ« detyrueshme janÃ« tÃ« 
rÃ«ndomta nÃ« software-et pronÃ«sore, dhe disa pÃ«rkrahÃ«s tÃ« burimit tÃ« 
hapur duan t'i sendÃ«rtojnÃ« ato nÃ« programe me burim tÃ« hapur."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "Under pressure from the movie and record companies, software for 
individuals to use is increasingly designed specifically to restrict them.  
This malicious feature is known as Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) (see 
<a href=\"http://defectivebydesign.org/\";>DefectiveByDesign.org</a>) and is the 
antithesis in spirit of the freedom that free software aims to provide.  And 
not just in spirit: since the goal of DRM is to trample your freedom, DRM 
developers try to make it hard, impossible, or even illegal for you to change 
the software that implements the DRM."
-msgstr "NÃ«n trysninÃ« e kompanive tÃ« filmit dhe regjistrimit tÃ« muzikÃ«s, 
software-et pÃ«r pÃ«rdoren nga individÃ«t hartohen gjithnjÃ« e mÃ« shumÃ« pÃ«r 
t'i kufizuar ata.  Kjo veÃ§ori dashakeqe njihet si Administrim Dixhital i 
Kufizimeve (DRM - Digital Restrictions Management) (shihni <a 
href=\"http://defectivebydesign.org/\";>DefectiveByDesign.org</a>) dhe Ã«shtÃ« 
krejt e kundÃ«rta e frymÃ«s sÃ« lirisÃ« qÃ« software-i i lirÃ« synon tÃ« 
ofrojÃ«.  Dhe jo vetÃ«m e frymÃ«s: ngaqÃ« synimi i DRM-sÃ« Ã«shtÃ« tÃ« shkelÃ« 
me kÃ«mbÃ« lirinÃ« tuaj, zhvilluesit e DRM-sÃ«  pÃ«rpiqen t'jua bÃ«jnÃ« tÃ« 
vÃ«shtirÃ«, tÃ« pamundur, ose madje edhe tÃ« paligjshme  ndryshimin e 
software-it qÃ« sendÃ«rton nÃ« praktikÃ« DRM-nÃ«."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "Yet some open source supporters have proposed &ldquo;open source 
DRM&rdquo; software.  Their idea is that, by publishing the source code of 
programs designed to restrict your access to encrypted media and by allowing 
others to change it, they will produce more powerful and reliable software for 
restricting users like you.  The software would then be delivered to you in 
devices that do not allow you to change it."
-msgstr "MegjithatÃ« disa pÃ«rkrahÃ«s tÃ« burimit tÃ« hapur kanÃ« propozuar 
software &ldquo;DRM me burim tÃ« hapur&rdquo;.  Ideja e tyre Ã«shtÃ« qÃ«, duke 
bÃ«rÃ« publik kodin burim tÃ« programeve tÃ« hartuar pÃ«r tÃ« kufizuar hyrjen 
tuaj nÃ« media tÃ« koduara dhe duke u lejuar tÃ« tjerÃ«ve ta ndryshojnÃ« atÃ«, 
do tÃ« prodhonin software mÃ« tÃ« fuqishÃ«m dhe mÃ« tÃ« qÃ«ndrueshÃ«m pÃ«r 
kufizimin e pÃ«rdoruesve si ju.  Software-i mandej do tÃ« dÃ«rgohej pÃ«r ju te 
pajisje qÃ« nuk ju lejojnÃ« ta ndryshoni."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "This software might be open source and use the open source development 
model, but it won't be free software since it won't respect the freedom of the 
users that actually run it.  If the open source development model succeeds in 
making this software more powerful and reliable for restricting you, that will 
make it even worse."
-msgstr "Ky software mund tÃ« jetÃ« me burim tÃ« hapur dhe tÃ« pÃ«rdorÃ« 
modelin e zhvillimit me burim tÃ« hapur, por nuk ka pÃ«r tÃ« qenÃ« software i 
lirÃ«, sa kohÃ« qÃ« nuk do tÃ« respektojÃ« lirinÃ« e pÃ«rdoruesve qÃ« e 
xhirojnÃ« faktikisht atÃ«. NÃ«se modeli i zhvillimit me burim tÃ« hapur ia del 
ta bÃ«jÃ« kÃ«tÃ« software mÃ« tÃ« fuqishÃ«m dhe mÃ« tÃ« qÃ«ndrueshÃ«m pÃ«r 
kufizimin tuaj, kjo do ta bÃ«nte edhe mÃ« tÃ« keq."
-
 #. type: Content of: <h3>
 msgid "Fear of Freedom"
 msgstr "FrikÃ« nga Liria"
@@ -270,30 +175,7 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid "Sooner or later these users will be invited to switch back to 
proprietary software for some practical advantage.  Countless companies seek to 
offer such temptation, some even offering copies gratis.  Why would users 
decline? Only if they have learned to value the freedom free software gives 
them, to value freedom in and of itself rather than the technical and practical 
convenience of specific free software.  To spread this idea, we have to talk 
about freedom.  A certain amount of the &ldquo;keep quiet&rdquo; approach to 
business can be useful for the community, but it is dangerous if it becomes so 
common that the love of freedom comes to seem like an eccentricity."
-msgstr "HerÃ«t a vonÃ« kÃ«ta pÃ«rdorues do t'i ftojnÃ« tÃ« rikthehen te 
software-i pronÃ«sor, pÃ«r disa avantazhe praktike.  Kompani tÃ« panumÃ«rta 
punojnÃ« pÃ«r tÃ« ofruar tundim tÃ« tillÃ«, disa duke ofruar kopje gratis.  Pse 
do tÃ« duhej qÃ« pÃ«rdoruesit tÃ« mos i pranonin? Ah, vetÃ«m po t'u kenÃ« 
mÃ«suar tÃ« Ã§mojnÃ« lirinÃ« qÃ« u jep software-i i lirÃ«, tÃ« Ã§mojnÃ« lirinÃ« 
nÃ« vetvete, nÃ« vend se volitÃ« teknike dhe praktike tÃ« njÃ« software-i tÃ« 
lirÃ« specifik, atÃ«herÃ« po.  PÃ«r pÃ«rhapjen e kÃ«saj ideje, na duhet tÃ« 
flasim pÃ«r lirinÃ«.  Deri nÃ« njÃ« farÃ« shkalle, rruga &ldquo;mos fol&rdquo; 
karshi biznesit mund tÃ« jetÃ« e dobishÃ«m pÃ«r bashkÃ«sinÃ«, por Ã«shtÃ« e 
rrezikshme nÃ«se bÃ«het aq e rÃ«ndomtÃ«, sa dashuria pÃ«r lirinÃ« tÃ« vijÃ« e 
tÃ« duket si diÃ§ka ekscentrike."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "That dangerous situation is exactly what we have.  Most people involved 
with free software, especially its distributors, say little about 
freedom&mdash;usually because they seek to be &ldquo;more acceptable to 
business.&rdquo; Nearly all GNU/Linux operating system distributions add 
proprietary packages to the basic free system, and they invite users to 
consider this an advantage rather than a flaw."
-msgstr "Kjo gjendje e rrezikshme Ã«shtÃ« saktÃ«sisht ajo qÃ« kemi.  Shumica e 
personave tÃ« pÃ«rfshirÃ« me software-in e lirÃ«, veÃ§anÃ«risht shpÃ«rndarÃ«sit 
e tij, flasin pak pÃ«r lirinÃ«&mdash;zakonisht ngaqÃ« kÃ«rkojnÃ« tÃ« jenÃ« 
&ldquo;mÃ« tÃ« pranueshÃ«m nga bizneset.&rdquo; Thuajse krejt shpÃ«rndarjet e 
sistemit operativ GNU/Linux i shtojnÃ« paketa pronÃ«sore sistemit bazÃ« tÃ« 
lirÃ«, dhe i ftojnÃ« pÃ«rdoruesit ta shohin kÃ«tÃ« si njÃ« avantazh, nÃ« vend 
se njÃ« cen."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "Proprietary add-on software and partially nonfree GNU/Linux 
distributions find fertile ground because most of our community does not insist 
on freedom with its software.  This is no coincidence.  Most GNU/Linux users 
were introduced to the system through &ldquo;open source&rdquo; discussion, 
which doesn't say that freedom is a goal.  The practices that don't uphold 
freedom and the words that don't talk about freedom go hand in hand, each 
promoting the other.  To overcome this tendency, we need more, not less, talk 
about freedom."
-msgstr "Software-et shtesÃ« pronÃ«sorÃ« dhe shpÃ«rndarjet GNU/Linux 
pjesÃ«risht jo tÃ« lira gjejnÃ« tokÃ« pjellore ngaqÃ« shumica e bashkÃ«sisÃ« 
sonÃ« nuk kÃ«mbÃ«ngul te liria nÃ« software-in e vet.  Kjo nuk Ã«shtÃ« 
rastÃ«si.  Shumica e pÃ«rdoruesve tÃ« GNU/Linux-it u njohÃ«n fillimisht me 
sistemin pÃ«rmes diskutimeve tÃ« &ldquo;burimit tÃ« hapur&rdquo;, nÃ« tÃ« cilin 
nuk pÃ«rmendet se liria Ã«shtÃ« njÃ« nga synimet.  Praktikat qÃ« nuk pÃ«rkrahin 
lirinÃ« dhe fjalÃ«t qÃ« nuk thonÃ« gjÃ« pÃ«r lirinÃ« ecin paralel, duke nxitur 
njÃ«ra tjetrÃ«n.  PÃ«r ta kapÃ«rcyer kÃ«tÃ« prirje, na duhet tÃ« flasim mÃ« 
tepÃ«r pÃ«r lirinÃ«, jo mÃ« pak."
-
-msgid "The main initial motivation of those who split off the open source camp 
from the free software movement was that the ethical ideas of &ldquo;free 
software&rdquo; made some people uneasy.  That's true: raising ethical issues 
such as freedom, talking about responsibilities as well as convenience, is 
asking people to think about things they might prefer to ignore, such as 
whether their conduct is ethical.  This can trigger discomfort, and some people 
may simply close their minds to it.  It does not follow that we ought to stop 
talking about these issues."
-msgstr "Motivacioni fillestar kryesor i atyre qÃ« nxorÃ«n kampin e burimit tÃ« 
hapur mÃ« vete prej lÃ«vizjes sÃ« software-it tÃ« lirÃ« qe qÃ« idetÃ« etike tÃ« 
&ldquo;software-it tÃ« lirÃ«&rdquo; i vinin nÃ« siklet disa njerÃ«z.  Kjo 
Ã«shtÃ« e vÃ«rtetÃ«: ngritja e Ã§Ã«shtjeve etike si liria, pÃ«rgjegjÃ«sive 
kundrejt volisÃ«, do tÃ« thotÃ« t'u kÃ«rkosh njerÃ«zve tÃ« mendojnÃ« pÃ«r 
gjÃ«ra qÃ« ata mund tÃ« parapÃ«lqejnÃ« t'i shpÃ«rfillin, fjala vjen a Ã«shtÃ« 
etike apo jo sjellja e tyre.  Kjo mund tÃ« shkaktojÃ« parehati, dhe disa 
njerÃ«z thjesht mund ta mbyllin mendjen pÃ«r gjÃ«ra tÃ« tilla.  Por kjo nuk do 
tÃ« thotÃ« qÃ« ne do tÃ« duhej tÃ« reshtnim sÃ« foluri pÃ«r kÃ«to probleme."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "That is, however, what the leaders of open source decided to do.  They 
figured that by keeping quiet about ethics and freedom, and talking only about 
the immediate practical benefits of certain free software, they might be able 
to &ldquo;sell&rdquo; the software more effectively to certain users, 
especially business."
-msgstr "E megjithatÃ« kjo Ã«shtÃ« ajo Ã§ka drejtuesit e burimit tÃ« hapur 
vendosÃ«n tÃ« bÃ«nin.  U doli se duke heshtur rreth etikÃ«s dhe lirisÃ«, dhe 
duke folur vetÃ«m pÃ«r pÃ«rfitimet e menjÃ«hershme praktike tÃ« disa 
software-eve tÃ« lira, mund tÃ« ishin nÃ« gjendje ta &ldquo;shisnin&rdquo; 
software-in mÃ« me efekt te disa pÃ«rdorues, veÃ§anÃ«risht bizneset."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "This approach has proved effective, in its own terms.  The rhetoric of 
open source has convinced many businesses and individuals to use, and even 
develop, free software, which has extended our community&mdash;but only at the 
superficial, practical level.  The philosophy of open source, with its purely 
practical values, impedes understanding of the deeper ideas of free software; 
it brings many people into our community, but does not teach them to defend it. 
 That is good, as far as it goes, but it is not enough to make freedom secure.  
Attracting users to free software takes them just part of the way to becoming 
defenders of their own freedom."
-msgstr "Kjo rrugÃ« ka dalÃ« me efektshmÃ«ri, brenda logjikÃ«s sÃ« vet.  
Retorika e burimit tÃ« hapur ka bindur mjaft biznese dhe individÃ« tÃ« 
pÃ«rdorin, madje edhe tÃ« zhvillojnÃ«, software tÃ« lirÃ«, Ã§ka e ka zgjeruar 
bashkÃ«sinÃ« tonÃ«&mdash;por vetÃ«m nÃ« nivel sipÃ«rfaqÃ«sor, praktik.  
Filozofia e burimit tÃ« hapur, me vlerat e veta pastÃ«rtisht praktike, e pengon 
tÃ« kuptuarit e ideve mÃ« tÃ« thella tÃ« software-it tÃ« lirÃ«; sjell mjaft 
vetÃ« te bashkÃ«sia jonÃ«, por nuk u mÃ«son atyre se si ta mbrojnÃ« atÃ«.  Kjo 
Ã«shtÃ« gjÃ« e mirÃ«, pÃ«r aq sa bÃ«n, por nuk mjafton pÃ«r ta bÃ«rÃ« lirinÃ« 
tÃ« sigurt.  TÃ«rheqja e pÃ«rdoruesve drejt software-it tÃ« lirÃ«  Ã«shtÃ« 
vetÃ«m njÃ« pjesÃ« e rrugÃ«s pÃ«r t'i bÃ«rÃ« mbrojtÃ«s tÃ« lirisÃ« sÃ« tyre."
-
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "Sooner or later these users will be invited to switch back to 
proprietary software for some practical advantage.  Countless companies seek to 
offer such temptation, some even offering copies gratis.  Why would users 
decline? Only if they have learned to value the freedom free software gives 
them, to value freedom in and of itself rather than the technical and practical 
convenience of specific free software.  To spread this idea, we have to talk 
about freedom.  A certain amount of the &ldquo;keep quiet&rdquo; approach to 
business can be useful for the community, but it is dangerous if it becomes so 
common that the love of freedom comes to seem like an eccentricity."
-msgstr "HerÃ«t a vonÃ« kÃ«ta pÃ«rdorues do t'i ftojnÃ« tÃ« rikthehen te 
software-i pronÃ«sor, pÃ«r disa avantazhe praktike.  Kompani tÃ« panumÃ«rta 
punojnÃ« pÃ«r tÃ« ofruar tundim tÃ« tillÃ«, disa duke ofruar kopje gratis.  Pse 
do tÃ« duhej qÃ« pÃ«rdoruesit tÃ« mos i pranonin? VetÃ«m po t'u kenÃ« mÃ«suar 
tÃ« Ã§mojnÃ« lirinÃ« qÃ« u jep software-i i lirÃ«, tÃ« Ã§mojnÃ« lirinÃ« nÃ« 
vetvete, nÃ« vend se volitÃ« teknike dhe praktike tÃ« njÃ« software-i tÃ« lirÃ« 
specifik.  PÃ«r pÃ«rhapjen e kÃ«saj ideje, na duhet tÃ« flasim pÃ«r lirinÃ«.  
Deri nÃ« njÃ« farÃ« shkalle, trajtimi &ldquo;mos fol&rdquo; pÃ«r bizneset mund 
tÃ« jetÃ« i dobishÃ«m pÃ«r bashkÃ«sinÃ«, por Ã«shtÃ« i rrezikshÃ«m nÃ«se bÃ«het 
aq i rÃ«ndomtÃ« sa dashuria pÃ«r lirinÃ« tÃ« vijÃ« e tÃ« duket si diÃ§ka 
ekscentrike."
+msgstr "HerÃ«t a vonÃ« kÃ«ta pÃ«rdorues do t'i ftojnÃ« tÃ« rikthehen te 
software-i pronÃ«sor, pÃ«r disa avantazhe praktike.  PÃ«r tÃ« ofruar tundim tÃ« 
tillÃ« punojnÃ« kompani tÃ« panumÃ«rta, disa duke ofruar kopje gratis.  Pse do 
tÃ« duhej qÃ« pÃ«rdoruesit tÃ« mos i pranonin? Ah, vetÃ«m po t'u kenÃ« mÃ«suar 
tÃ« Ã§mojnÃ« lirinÃ« qÃ« u jep software-i i lirÃ«, tÃ« Ã§mojnÃ« lirinÃ« nÃ« 
vetvete, nÃ« vend se volitÃ« teknike dhe praktike tÃ« njÃ« software-i tÃ« lirÃ« 
specifik, atÃ«herÃ« po.  PÃ«r pÃ«rhapjen e kÃ«saj ideje, na duhet tÃ« flasim 
pÃ«r lirinÃ«.  Deri nÃ« njÃ« farÃ« shkalle, rruga &ldquo;mos fol&rdquo; karshi 
biznesit mund tÃ« jetÃ« e dobishÃ«m pÃ«r bashkÃ«sinÃ«, por Ã«shtÃ« e rrezikshme 
nÃ«se bÃ«het aq e rÃ«ndomtÃ«, sa dashuria pÃ«r lirinÃ« tÃ« vijÃ« e tÃ« duket si 
diÃ§ka ekscentrike."
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid "That dangerous situation is exactly what we have.  Most people involved 
with free software, especially its distributors, say little about 
freedom&mdash;usually because they seek to be &ldquo;more acceptable to 
business.&rdquo; Nearly all GNU/Linux operating system distributions add 
proprietary packages to the basic free system, and they invite users to 
consider this an advantage rather than a flaw."
@@ -301,7 +183,7 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid "Proprietary add-on software and partially nonfree GNU/Linux 
distributions find fertile ground because most of our community does not insist 
on freedom with its software.  This is no coincidence.  Most GNU/Linux users 
were introduced to the system through &ldquo;open source&rdquo; discussion, 
which doesn't say that freedom is a goal.  The practices that don't uphold 
freedom and the words that don't talk about freedom go hand in hand, each 
promoting the other.  To overcome this tendency, we need more, not less, talk 
about freedom."
-msgstr "Software-et shtesÃ« pronÃ«sorÃ« dhe shpÃ«rndarjet GNU/Linux 
pjesÃ«risht jo tÃ« lira gjejnÃ« tokÃ« pjellore ngaqÃ« shumica e bashkÃ«sisÃ« 
sonÃ« nuk kÃ«mbÃ«ngul te liria nÃ« software-in e vet.  Kjo nuk Ã«shtÃ« 
rastÃ«si.  Shumica e pÃ«rdoruesve tÃ« GNU/Linux-it u njohÃ«n fillimisht me 
sistemin pÃ«rmes diskutimeve tÃ« &ldquo;burimit tÃ« hapur&rdquo;, nÃ« tÃ« cilin 
nuk pÃ«rmendet se liria Ã«shtÃ« njÃ« nga synimet.  Praktikat qÃ« nuk pÃ«rkrahin 
lirinÃ« dhe fjalÃ«t qÃ« nuk thonÃ« gjÃ« pÃ«r lirinÃ« ecin paralel, duke nxitur 
njÃ«ra tjetrÃ«n.  PÃ«r ta kapÃ«rcyer kÃ«tÃ« prirje, na duhet tÃ« flasim mÃ« 
tepÃ«r pÃ«r lirinÃ«, jo mÃ« pak."
+msgstr "Software-et shtesÃ« pronÃ«sorÃ« dhe shpÃ«rndarjet GNU/Linux 
pjesÃ«risht jo tÃ« lira gjejnÃ« tokÃ« pjellore ngaqÃ« shumica e bashkÃ«sisÃ« 
sonÃ« nuk kÃ«mbÃ«ngul te liria nÃ« software-in e vet.  Kjo nuk Ã«shtÃ« 
rastÃ«si.  Shumica e pÃ«rdoruesve tÃ« GNU/Linux-it u njohÃ«n fillimisht me 
sistemin pÃ«rmes diskutimeve tÃ« &ldquo;burimit tÃ« hapur&rdquo;, nÃ« tÃ« cilin 
nuk pÃ«rmendet se liria Ã«shtÃ« njÃ« nga synimet.  Praktikat qÃ« nuk pÃ«rkrahin 
lirinÃ« dhe fjalÃ«t qÃ« nuk thonÃ« gjÃ« pÃ«r lirinÃ« ecin paralel, duke nxitur 
njÃ«ra-tjetrÃ«n.  PÃ«r ta kapÃ«rcyer kÃ«tÃ« prirje, na duhet tÃ« flasim mÃ« 
tepÃ«r pÃ«r lirinÃ«, jo mÃ« pak."
 
 #. type: Content of: <h3>
 msgid "Conclusion"
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread]
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Besnik Bleta, 2012/12/09
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Besnik Bleta, 2012/12/09
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Besnik Bleta, 2012/12/09
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Besnik Bleta, 2012/12/18
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Besnik Bleta <=
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Tom Uijldert, 2012/12/25
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., GNUN, 2012/12/29
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., NIIBE Yutaka, 2012/12/29
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., GNUN, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Dora Scilipoti, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., GNUN, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Pavel Kharitonov, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Dora Scilipoti, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., GNUN, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Pavel Kharitonov, 2012/12/30
Prev by Date: www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....
Next by Date: www/philosophy open-source-misses-the-point.sq....
Previous by thread: www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....
Next by thread: www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread