[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [uracoli-devel] Re: Introducing myself and my project
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [uracoli-devel] Re: Introducing myself and my project |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:40:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
As Axel Wachtler wrote:
> Or if you don't need FCC legitimation, then self building a module
> is also an alternative. Joerg and Daniel can give you advice on the
> RF part.
I never really looked at the respective FCC regulations though. I did
conduct some measurements for my (older) "tiny230" board, aiming to
demonstrate that a home-made assembly could satisfy the ETSI
regulatory requirements. ETSI land is IMHO somewhat simpler here,
because (in really short terms), you only have to *declare* conformity
with all the regulatory requirements (and you only have to do that
when giving the product away -- when operating your own devices you
are only responsible to obey all the regulations), but it's up to you
how you came to the opinion that you actually *are* conformant. (The
actualy details are more complicated, of course, so in all practical
terms, you won't get away without an "official" measurement lab at
least somewhere in the process.)
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)