[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2
From: |
Bob Carragher |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2 |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Mar 2015 21:22:40 -0700 |
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 10:35:54 +0000 Ralph Corderoy <address@hidden> sez:
> > find_draftmessage() {
> > skip_next=0
> >
> > for arg; do
> > case "$arg" in
> > -al* | -filt* | -wi* | -client | -idanno | -server | \
> > -partno | -saslmaxssf | -saslmech | -user | -por* | \
> > -file* | -mhl* | -mt* | -cr* | -lib* | -oauth)
> > skip_next=1
> > ;;
> > -*) skip_next=0;
> > ;;
> > *)
> > if [ "$skip_next" -eq 0 ]; then
> > draftmessage="$arg"
> > return 0
> > fi
> > skip_next=0
> > ;;
> > esac
> > done
> >
> > echo "Cannot find draft message name in argument list"
> > exit 1
> > }
>
> I think that can be simpler, given a function has a "$@" that's
> distinct from the scripts, e.g.
>
> find_draftmessage() {
> while test $# -ne 0; do
> case "$1" in
> -al* | -filt* | -wi* | -client | -idanno | -server | \
> -partno | -saslmaxssf | -saslmech | -user | -por* | \
> -file* | -mhl* | -mt* | -cr* | -lib* | -oauth)
> shift
> ;;
> -*) ;;
> *)
> draftmessage="$1"
> return 0
> ;;
> esac
> shift
> done
>
> echo "usage: localpostproc [...] file [...]" >&2
> exit 1
> }
This works for me. Thanks, Ralph!
Bob
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/03/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/03/06
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/10
Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2,
Bob Carragher <=
Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/03/11
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/11
Message not availableRe: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/11
Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/03/11
Message not availableRe: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/11
Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/11
Message not availableRe: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/11