[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:04:12 -0700 |
On Mar 25, 2014, at 5:59 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg <address@hidden> wrote:
> The (UW) Alpine equivalent is the 'alt-adresses' construct. BSD Mail and
> SysV mailx both had equivalent settings as I recall.
(Free)BSD's mail(1) says:
alternates
(alt) The alternates command is useful if you have accounts on
several machines. It can be used to inform mail that the listed
addresses are really you. When you reply to messages, mail will
not send a copy of the message to any of the addresses listed on
the alternates list. If the alternates command is given with no
argument, the current set of alternative names is displayed.
I'm pretty sure mailx acted the same way.
--lyndon
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Bob Carragher, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Robert Elz, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Bob Carragher, 2014/03/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/26
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Bob Carragher, 2014/03/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Paul Fox, 2014/03/26
Message not availableRe: [Nmh-workers] Replying ... but not to "me" too, Bob Carragher, 2014/03/26